2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesive contact based on the Lennard–Jones potential: a correction to the value of the equilibrium distance as used in the potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar adhesion laws have been adopted elsewhere (Seifert, 1991;Mishin et al, 2002;Komura et al, 2005). The equilibrium separation o  should not be interpreted as the equilibrium length scale of an atomistic potential (Yu and Polycarpou, 2004), but should be regarded as a bulk adhesion parameter. Similarly, the work of adhesion ad W and the interface strength m  are also considered bulk parameters in this analysis, representing all physics that contribute to the effective behavior of the adhesive layer.…”
Section: The Adhesive Lawmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar adhesion laws have been adopted elsewhere (Seifert, 1991;Mishin et al, 2002;Komura et al, 2005). The equilibrium separation o  should not be interpreted as the equilibrium length scale of an atomistic potential (Yu and Polycarpou, 2004), but should be regarded as a bulk adhesion parameter. Similarly, the work of adhesion ad W and the interface strength m  are also considered bulk parameters in this analysis, representing all physics that contribute to the effective behavior of the adhesive layer.…”
Section: The Adhesive Lawmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the wafer and gold nanocap shell height is calculated using the given system parameters and the shallow cap approximation 2 2 H a   , while for the cell and lipid bilayer the height is set equal to the estimated radius for a spherical geometry; b. Maximum stress is calculated using the given system parameters and (4); c. Turner and Spearing (2002); d. Yu and Polycarpou (2004); e. Salvadori et al (2003); f. Charnay et al (2003); g. Pesen and Hoh (2005); h. Estimated thickness of the actin cortex from Lang et al (2000) and Pesen and Hoh (2005); i. Simson et al (1998);j.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the physical absorption effect, which is due to the short-range interatomic interaction, without an electron transfer across the interface. Based on this assumption, we use the well-established adhesive force theory based on the Hamaker constant [34]. Microscopically, the interaction between the CNT and the electrode is the adhesion between the two surfaces which are close to each other, and the adhesive force per unit area is described by Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This adhesive force can vary from the zero-voltage value to the maximum value F max ad at the connection stage, in response to an increase of the force pulling the CNT back due to the elastic restoring force and electrostatic force. A simple expression with an analytical form of the adhesive force per unit area at he CNT/metal interface, derived from the Lennard-Jones potential, is enough for describing the short-range interaction, in order to demonstrate the mechanism of operations of the present double-pole devices [34],…”
Section: Adhesive Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In macroscopic systems, we can represent the atomic interactions between atoms by surface tractions [16] and by assuming the surface traction to be in the zdirection, then for an LJ potential one can write the surface traction [17] …”
Section: Theory and Methods Of Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%