Physical theories distinguish two notions of time: reversible, homogeneous parameter time (relativity theory and quantum mechanics) and irreversible, directed time (thermodynamics). Both concepts differ fundamentally from what we define implicitly by using the tenses and temporal adverbs in language. The tempora past, present, and future hinge upon one uniquely exposed moment: the now. The now is the moment of actuality in the process of subjective awareness.It proceeds spontaneously and irresistibly in relation to all datable points of time.Without reference to the moving now, past and future only denote directions in time. But there is no physical definition of the now. Physical time, be it reversible or irreversible, differs from subjectively experienced time in that it is atemporal.Because physics has no notion of the now it cannot genuinely treat past and future as temporal regions. As a physicist, Einstein consistently declared the division of time into these regions as illusory. In the first two sections of this paper we reaffirm that Einstein was right on logical grounds. In the third section, however, we insist that the actuality of the now and its movement are truths that logical reason has not the power to question. In the fourth section we shall be looking for a clue to escape the dilemma.
Physical TimeRelativity theory dispelled the notion of absolute simultaneity, which was inherent in the view of an objective, independently definable now. If Franck, Physical time & intinsic temporality 2/26 simultaneity is relative to the location of an observer, the now is relative to that location, too. Locations that are spatially distant or distinct with regard to relative motion will differ in time accordingly. If the now is the moment of actuality surrounded by regions of what is no more and not yet actual, locations that differ in time cannot belong to the same actual world. The world as actualized in the now is actual only in the realm of one and the same now.Unsynchronized nows unequivocally belong to different worlds. Thus, temporality splits the universe into as many worlds as there are locations possibly occupied by observers. Einstein's dictum states that this multitude is only subjective and illusory.Compared with this recent argument there is an age-old one giving rise to a similar conclusion. In the third century B.C., Zeno of Elea set out his riddles of motion which, after a long history of futile efforts to solve them, proved to originate in our notion of the now. Achilles cannot come abreast of the tortoise, the runner in the stadium cannot get started, the arrow must stand still in the air, because for any spatial distance to be traversed there is an infinity of subdistances to be passed. Since each distance, however small, can be subdivided without limit there is an infinity of acts, so the argument, necessary to overcome it. The duration of an infinite number of acts, irrespective of their lengths, always adds to eternity. Thus, motion is impossible.Zeno's paradoxes deal with a c...