2013
DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint modeling of stream depletion in groundwater‐surface water systems

Abstract: [1] Groundwater pumping may lead to reduction in surface water flows, which can compromise water supplies and habitat. In light of these threats, the need to minimize stream depletion, defined as the reduction in the flow rate in streams and rivers caused by groundwater pumping, becomes paramount. We develop adjoint equations to calculate stream depletion due to aquifer pumping. We consider a coupled groundwater and surface water system in which both the river head and river flow rate are impacted by drawdown … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gray shade corresponds to the normalized stream depletion, ∆Q r /Q p , that would result from pumping from a well at that location for 20 years in an aquifer with a K value of 5 m d −1 . For these simulations, Equation (1) was solved using the adjoint approach [39], using a homogeneous streambed with K r = 3 × 10 −3 m d −1 (Figure 4a) and K r = 4 × 10 −3 m d −1 (Figure 4b). Both of these K r values are within the sensitive K r range for Scenario (a), Figure 3a.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Stream Depletion Estimates To Streambed Condumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gray shade corresponds to the normalized stream depletion, ∆Q r /Q p , that would result from pumping from a well at that location for 20 years in an aquifer with a K value of 5 m d −1 . For these simulations, Equation (1) was solved using the adjoint approach [39], using a homogeneous streambed with K r = 3 × 10 −3 m d −1 (Figure 4a) and K r = 4 × 10 −3 m d −1 (Figure 4b). Both of these K r values are within the sensitive K r range for Scenario (a), Figure 3a.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Stream Depletion Estimates To Streambed Condumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equation of the backward probability model can be derived by applying the adjoint method to the forward ADE. The adjoint method evaluates the sensitivity of a system state (e.g., head and concentration) with respect to changes in a system parameter (e.g., hydraulic parameters, Sykes et al, ; recharge areas, Jyrkama & Sykes, ; and river stage, Griebling & Neupauer, ). Similarly, the backward probability model solves the adjoint state of concentration, ψi*, which corresponds to the marginal sensitivity of the concentration (or system state) to the source mass (or system parameter) (Neupauer & Wilson, ): ψi*(),,,xτboldxobsτobs=normaldCi(),boldxobsτobsnormaldMi(),xτ, where τ is the backward time (T) representing an amount of time prior to a contaminant detection (or observation) at τ obs ( τ = 0), which corresponds to t 3 in Figure a.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considered individually or used to generate maps or rankings, we refer to them by the more intuitive term "depletion potential." Depletion potential (e.g., Ahlfeld et al 2016) can be calculated in a variety of ways including using Adjoint State (Neupauer and Griebling 2012;Griebling and Neupauer 2013) and reformulation of the underlying process model (Ou et al 2016).…”
Section: Depletion Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%