2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjunctive azithromycin in the treatment of aggressive periodontitis: Microbiological findings of a 12-month randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some clinical reports indicated the similar results (Han et al, 2012, Haas et al, 2012). With respect to colony‐forming ability of the samples obtained from organ culture infection models treated with test antibiotics, the combination of AMX or CDR and MTZ effectively treated all bacterial combinations that we tested (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Some clinical reports indicated the similar results (Han et al, 2012, Haas et al, 2012). With respect to colony‐forming ability of the samples obtained from organ culture infection models treated with test antibiotics, the combination of AMX or CDR and MTZ effectively treated all bacterial combinations that we tested (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Analysis of the abstracts resulted in 95 potential articles. In the third phase, the full text articles of the remaining 95 articles were evaluated, of which 40 did not pass the inclusion criteria (Table ). Another 12 articles were excluded because they were about patients with aggressive periodontitis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 However, the improved clinical outcomes produced by adjunctive AZM have not always been associated with significant suppression of subgingival pathogens. Although some studies have shown that AZM suppresses periodontal pathogens, 40,42 others either did not observe a significant adjunctive effect 43 or did not conduct a statistical analysis of microbiologic data. 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%