2010
DOI: 10.1364/ol.35.000739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustable adaptive compact fluidic phoropter with no mechanical translation of lenses

Abstract: We demonstrate a compact optical phoroptor consisting of adjustable astigmatic and defocus lenses. The lenses are fluidically controlled and allow for an arbitrary refractive error to be corrected without mechanically moving lenses. Shack-Hartmann measurements were used to characterize the optical properties of the individual lenses. The lenses were then assembled into the phoropter and controlled with three separate fluid controls. The phoroptor was verified by correcting the vision of a model eye with an ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elastomeric lenses thus differ significantly from pressure-actuated membrane lenses, since the latter will need at least three membranes to tune, for example, focal length and astigmatism. 6 Furthermore, elastomeric lenses benefit from a well-defined optical surface even in the unstrained state, in contrast to liquid lenses, where the surface is shaped by an equilibrium of surface tension and gravity, and membrane-type lenses, where the membrane must be significantly distended to achieve short focal lengths. Finally, gravitational sagging (introducing coma as a dominant wavefront error), which is an issue for many membrane lenses, does not occur with these bulk elastomeric lenses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elastomeric lenses thus differ significantly from pressure-actuated membrane lenses, since the latter will need at least three membranes to tune, for example, focal length and astigmatism. 6 Furthermore, elastomeric lenses benefit from a well-defined optical surface even in the unstrained state, in contrast to liquid lenses, where the surface is shaped by an equilibrium of surface tension and gravity, and membrane-type lenses, where the membrane must be significantly distended to achieve short focal lengths. Finally, gravitational sagging (introducing coma as a dominant wavefront error), which is an issue for many membrane lenses, does not occur with these bulk elastomeric lenses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more versatile approach with a combination of several membrane lenses was pursued by Marks et al 6 Here two perpendicularly oriented cylindrical lenses provide variable astigmatism, whose total focus is compensated with a rotational symmetric membrane lens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These recent E-lens device technologies and adaptive optic system advances can be incorporated in the proposed eye vision system using micromachines to enable user scenario-dependent optimal performance. also been proposed for phoropters in a patent by Quaglia in 1995 [27] and later in 2010 by the group of Peyghambarian [28]. In 1996, an LC diffractive-optic E-Lens had been designed [29] and in 2006, the Peyghambarian group suggested the use of the LC diffractive-optic E-Lens for eye exams to measure eye refractive power change [30].…”
Section: History Of Electronic Lenses In Human Vision Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting in the mid-1980s, the General Electric Corporate Research & Development Center (GE-CRD) fabricated novel electronically controlled Liquid Crystal (LC) lens devices, including for eye correction measurement applications [6][7][8]. Use of liquid-based lenses using mechanical pressure to change lens focal length has also been proposed for phoropters in 1995 and also more recently [9][10]. In addition, apart from using an electronic LC lens in a phoropter to get new eyewear refractive readings [7], two dimensional (2-D) optical spatial light modulator devices (via LC and micromachined or MEMS) devices have be proposed for color blindness tests as well as to provide the capability to perform eye strain relief and eye muscle exercises [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%