2018
DOI: 10.5705/ss.202016.0093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustments for a class of tests under nonstandard conditions

Abstract: Generally the Likelihood Ratio statistic Λ for standard hypotheses is asymptotically χ 2 distributed, and the Bartlett adjustment improves the χ 2 approximation to its asymptotic distribution in the sense of third-order asymptotics. However, if the parameter of interest is on the boundary of the parameter space, Self and Liang (1987) show that the limiting distribution of Λ is a mixture of χ 2 distributions. For such "nonstandard setting of hypotheses", the present paper develops the third-order asymptotic the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monti and Taniguchi (2018) developed the third‐order asymptotic theory for tests when the parameter is on the boundary of parameter space. Here, assuming that the parameter θ is scalar, and the parameter space is false[θ0,bfalse), where θ0 is the true value and b is a finite constant, we impose that the likelihood function Lnfalse(θfalse) is five times differentiable with respect to θ from the right‐hand side of θ0.…”
Section: Whittle Likelihood Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Monti and Taniguchi (2018) developed the third‐order asymptotic theory for tests when the parameter is on the boundary of parameter space. Here, assuming that the parameter θ is scalar, and the parameter space is false[θ0,bfalse), where θ0 is the true value and b is a finite constant, we impose that the likelihood function Lnfalse(θfalse) is five times differentiable with respect to θ from the right‐hand side of θ0.…”
Section: Whittle Likelihood Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let W1=gprefix−1false/2Z1false(θfalse) for θ=θ0. From (5.2) of Monti and Taniguchi (2018, p. 1455) it follows that Pn,θ0false(W1>0false)=12prefix−162πKn+o()1n. Then from Proposition 1, conditioning on W1>0, it is not difficult to see that the second‐order term of Eθ0false[nfalse(trueθ^Bprefix−θ0false)false] equals true1ntrue[prefix−trueK62πprefix−trueJg2prefix−trueK2g2+12ξgξtrue], which leads to the minimax prior ξ satisfying true1ξξ=Kg32π+2Jg+Kg,0...…”
Section: Whittle Likelihood Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations