2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant arteriovenous fistula as means of rescue for infrapopliteal venous bypass with poor runoff

Abstract: The adjuvant AV fistula increased graft flow significantly in a poor-outflow venous bypass. In this extreme patient group, acceptable patency and leg salvage was achieved without adverse effects. Despite this, the AV fistula did not improve the outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the fistula did not improve results, they did note that an adjunct fistula allowed patients with poor runoff to achieve comparable results for infrapopliteal bypass with superior runoff. 18 Graft flow was significantly higher in the fistula group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although the fistula did not improve results, they did note that an adjunct fistula allowed patients with poor runoff to achieve comparable results for infrapopliteal bypass with superior runoff. 18 Graft flow was significantly higher in the fistula group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, Laurila et al 18 identified no improvement in primary graft patency when an AVF was used in conjunction with a vein graft (RR ¼ 0.91, 95% CI 0.62e1.33).…”
Section: Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Subgroup analysis again revealed no significant difference between groups when RCTs alone 19,20 (RR ¼ 0.97, 95% CI 0.66e1.44), studies comparing synthetic grafts [14,16,17,19,20] (pooled RR ¼ 1.45, 95% CI 0.86e2.46), or those contrasting vein grafts 18 were analysed (RR ¼ 0.95, 95% CI 0.69e1.31).…”
Section: Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Длительность функцио-нирования синтетического и биологического проте-зов в бедренно-подколенной позиции в 2-2,5 раза меньше, чем аутовенозного трансплантата [1,12]. При неудовлетворительном состоянии путей оттока увеличения воспринимающего русла можно до-стичь путем наложения разгрузочной артериовеноз-ной фистулы, которая уменьшает сопротивление и тем самым способствует улучшению проходимости трансплантата [8,11]. Однако при этом резко сни-жается перфузия кровью ишемизированных тканей, что позволяет в большинстве наблюдений лишь уменьшить выраженность критической ишемии ко-нечностей, но не ликвидировать ее.…”
unclassified