2019
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008018.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure in premenopausal women

Abstract: Adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure in premenopausal women.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous meta-analysis of six studies that included clinically established markers of ovarian reserve, as estimated by the hormone dosage of AMH, which is the gold standard for this estimation, reported no improvement in ovarian markers though higher rates of recovery of menses in the GnRHa group, and no differences in pregnancy rates or fertility were found between the groups [141]. In line with these results, a recent Cochrane systematic review pointed out that there was insufficient evidence of fertility protection from GnRHa [142]. Of note, the 2018 panel of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASCO, recommended that GnRHa should not be used in place of proven fertility preservation methods [143].…”
Section: Potential Protective Treatments To Reduce/recover Chemothmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A previous meta-analysis of six studies that included clinically established markers of ovarian reserve, as estimated by the hormone dosage of AMH, which is the gold standard for this estimation, reported no improvement in ovarian markers though higher rates of recovery of menses in the GnRHa group, and no differences in pregnancy rates or fertility were found between the groups [141]. In line with these results, a recent Cochrane systematic review pointed out that there was insufficient evidence of fertility protection from GnRHa [142]. Of note, the 2018 panel of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASCO, recommended that GnRHa should not be used in place of proven fertility preservation methods [143].…”
Section: Potential Protective Treatments To Reduce/recover Chemothmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, more recent studies report conflicting results and emerging data on longer term follow-up fail to demonstrate a significant impact on future pregnancy rates, so there is insufficient evidence to recommend GnRHa for this indication alone. (Clowse et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2011;Turner et al, 2013;Del Mastro et al, 2014;Blumenfeld et al, 2015;Shen et al, 2015;Demeestere et al, 2016;Munhoz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Choice Of Therapy For Menstrual Suppression During Cancer Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 A Cochrane review concluded that use of adjuvant gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists reduced the risk of chemotherapy-induced POI (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.31-0.61). 78 Pelvic irradiation and radiotherapy doses more than 9 to 10 Gray confer an increased risk of POI with the greatest risk observed in postpubertal patients receiving alkylating chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RR: 29.3, 95% CI: 7.9-108). 10,14,75 Surgery may also cause POI/early menopause either due to direct excision of ovaries or due to disruption of gonadal blood supply during pelvic surgery.…”
Section: Iatrogenic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%