2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-013-1636-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADM-like Hamiltonian formulation of gravity in the teleparallel geometry: derivation of constraint algebra

Abstract: We derive a new constraint algebra for a Hamiltonian formulation of the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity treated as a theory of cotetrad fields on a spacetime. The algebra turns out to be closed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will show under which circumstances the constraint algebra closes, and under which circumstances additional constraints must be included, and finally lead to the full, dynamical Hamiltonian. It should be noted that the calculation of the Poisson brackets is straightforward, although it can be very lengthy, even in the case of TEGR [11]. Naively, the unconstrained case would be the easiest, since it involves the least number of constraints to calculate Poisson brackets with.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This will show under which circumstances the constraint algebra closes, and under which circumstances additional constraints must be included, and finally lead to the full, dynamical Hamiltonian. It should be noted that the calculation of the Poisson brackets is straightforward, although it can be very lengthy, even in the case of TEGR [11]. Naively, the unconstrained case would be the easiest, since it involves the least number of constraints to calculate Poisson brackets with.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for particular values of the parameters the terms which cause this behavior are absent from the action, thus allowing the Poisson brackets to close [25]. Due to the lengthiness of the calculations even in seemingly simple cases such as TEGR [11] we present these studies in separate articles. Another potential issue that must receive attention is the possible bifurcation of constraints, i.e., the situation where the closing or non-closing of the Poisson brackets depends on the particular values of the fields, as found in previous studies [32], which we plan to investigate in detail in further work.…”
Section: The Ngr Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10] that deals with an enlarged set of variables and constraints to enforce the vanishing of the curvature. The canonical formulation of TEGR has been also stated in the geometric language of differential forms [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions of these equations play an important role in deriving an ADM-like Hamiltonian framework of TEGR [4,8] and YMTM [15]-the configuration variable of Lagrangian formulations of TEGR and YMTM is a cotetrad field on a four-dimensional manifold; the cotetrad field is decomposed into "time-like" and "space-like" parts the latter one being (θ A ) ∈ Θ; then a solution of (4.14) is used to express the "time-like" part as a function of the ADM lapse function, the ADM shift vector field and (θ A ). Moreover, a solution of (4.14) appears in formulae describing constraints of both TEGR and YMTM, and the equations (4.14) are used repeatedly while deriving constraint algebras of both theories [8,17,15]. Note that at every point y ∈ Σ the values (ξ A (y)) of a solution of (4.14) form a timelike vector in M which means that the value ξ 0 (y) cannot be 0.…”
Section: New Variables and New Dofmentioning
confidence: 99%