2021
DOI: 10.32612/uw.27201643.2021.1.pp.112-124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Administrative-Territorial Reform in Ukraine: Normative-Legal Aspect of Decentralization Reform in Ukraine

Abstract: The need for effective, capable self-government inevitably faces the need to change the spatial organization of local governments. In turn, the territorial organization of executive bodies also turned out to be far from optimal. In Ukraine, there have been discussions for many years about the reorganization (reform) of the entire system of public power in the country. But they have mainly always concerned the redistribution of powers in the power triangle at the national level: President - Parliament - Governm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the current procedural law provides for a period of 10 days for considering the application for the recognition of the executive document as unenforceable. However, it is not always possible to issue the decision on the application within the determined period due to the workload of courts [20]. It is possible to carry out coercive measures because the submission and consideration by the court of the relevant application are not defined by law as a ground for suspending the commission of enforcement actions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the current procedural law provides for a period of 10 days for considering the application for the recognition of the executive document as unenforceable. However, it is not always possible to issue the decision on the application within the determined period due to the workload of courts [20]. It is possible to carry out coercive measures because the submission and consideration by the court of the relevant application are not defined by law as a ground for suspending the commission of enforcement actions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%