2017
DOI: 10.17239/l1esll-2017.17.02.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent reading and the reproduction of literary judgement: what adolescent book reviews of self-selected texts reveal

Abstract: A contrast is sometimes drawn between prescribed literary texts that develop literary judgement and, contrasting with them, self-selected texts read for pleasure. There is some scepticism in literature didactics about the ability of the latter to develop adolescents' literary judgement. This article reports on a study that questions this scepticism. One aim of the study was to establish whether and how adolescent readers can offer intersubjectively comprehensible and discursively negotiable judgements about th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such independent reading is a growing practice in Norwegian classrooms (for an overview, see Svanes, 2016). As an instructional practice, SSR of self-selected books has been promoted for its potential to stimulate motivation and positive attitudes towards reading (Siah & Kwok, 2010;Von Sprecken & Krashen, 1998) and to combine the student's development of literary judgment with pleasurable reading (Bertschi-Kaufmann & Graber, 2017). Research shows that continued silent reading might improve reading flow (Pressley & Allington, 2014), vocabulary (Cunningham, 2005, and reading comprehension (Hiebert, Wilson, & Trainin, 2010).…”
Section: Theory and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such independent reading is a growing practice in Norwegian classrooms (for an overview, see Svanes, 2016). As an instructional practice, SSR of self-selected books has been promoted for its potential to stimulate motivation and positive attitudes towards reading (Siah & Kwok, 2010;Von Sprecken & Krashen, 1998) and to combine the student's development of literary judgment with pleasurable reading (Bertschi-Kaufmann & Graber, 2017). Research shows that continued silent reading might improve reading flow (Pressley & Allington, 2014), vocabulary (Cunningham, 2005, and reading comprehension (Hiebert, Wilson, & Trainin, 2010).…”
Section: Theory and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the focus group discussions turned to learning activities in connection with teaching and reading fiction, the general tendency among the participants was their immediate focus on plot, characters, themes, and other literary devices-what literature didactics commonly emphasize as key elements (Bertschi-Kaufmann & Graber, 2017). "We start reading a text, and after a few pages I ask them what they can say about the text, in relation to the characters, the setting, and the tone" Teacher 1 in Group B said.…”
Section: Literary Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, characters are the keys to fictional worlds, they invite readers to the narrated events, and they are crucial to literary reception because they make identification possible for the reader (Bertschi-Kaufmann & Graber, 2017). Thus, focusing on characters and other literary devices could prove to be the key to the Reading Experience rather than being the formalistic approach that Blau (2003) questions.…”
Section: Literary Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, verbal ability is related to how well a teacher conveys concepts and skills to students (Beal-Alvarez & Scheetz, 2015;Bertschi-Kaufmann & Graber, 2017;Darling-Hammond & Friedlaender, 2008). When students understand what teachers are communicating, and when teachers understand the signals from their students in terms of their responses, a two-way communication process is created that enhances students' learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%