Adoption, Adaptive Innovation, and Creative Innovation Among SMEs in Malaysian Manufacturing

Hosseini, Seyed Mehrshad Parvin; Narayanan, Suresh

doi:10.1162/asep_a_00279

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Bessonova and Gonchar ( 2017 ) 49. Hosseini and Narayanan ( 2014 ) 50. Antikainen and Vaataja ( 2010 ) 51.…”

Section: Demographics Of the Literature Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Importance, relevance, and clear need The dominant attainment task value as gleaned from the literature is the importance, relevance, and clear need for innovative behavior and goals (Aarikka-Stenroos et al, 2017;Hosseini & Narayanan, 2014). To this end, studies suggested that clear links to desired goals like careers or mastery (Aarikka-Stenroos et al, 2017;Edwards et al, 2014;Sorice & Donlan, 2015;Xie & Reider, 2014) and easy to see logic to how the innovation would be important to society, with a particular emergent theme of social justice and conservation causes (Antikainen & Vaataja, 2010;Reznickova & Zepeda, 2016;Sorice & Donlan, 2015).…”

Section: Strategies For Building Attainment Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Leader strategies for motivating innovation in individuals: a systematic review

Soleas

2020

J Innov Entrep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation is a topic of intense interest and is seen as key to confronting the vast majority of issues facing humanity. To consolidate the knowledge about approaches promoting innovation, this study conducted a systematic review integrating an alldatabase (n = 375) search through EBSCOhost completed on April 6th, 2019 in addition to search engine use. Three hundred three studies were full-text reviewed yielding 82 final studies eligible for the inclusion in findings extraction. The findings were synthesized and then organized into the Expectancy-value-cost (EVC) motivation framework to isolate promotive and hindering factors. It is clear that there is an unbalanced primacy in the innovation literature in favor of business and corporate settings with very little representation from the arts or social justice sectors. There is also a common trend of using surveys of individuals in organizations within a single discipline, while interviews are rare. The paucity of studying costs of innovation in the literature is symptomatic of the primarily positive psychology approach taken by studies, rather than a framework like EVC which also considers detractive factors like costs. Numerous studies provide support for the notion that more internal motivations like intrinsic (e.g., interest) and attainment (e.g., importance, fulfillment) were more influential than external motivators like rewards as targets of strategies. Leaders should focus, whenever possible, on topics that engaged curiosity, interest, and satisfaction and, if they choose to use rewards, should focus their strategies to give related rewards; otherwise, they risk sundering the internal motivation to innovate for already interested workers.

show abstract

“…Bessonova and Gonchar ( 2017 ) 49. Hosseini and Narayanan ( 2014 ) 50. Antikainen and Vaataja ( 2010 ) 51.…”

Section: Demographics Of the Literature Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Strategies For Building Attainment Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

Leader strategies for motivating innovation in individuals: a systematic review

Soleas

2020

J Innov Entrep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is important to study OI within SMEs operating in various sectoral settings as research shows that differences in generated insights are often due to the unique characteristics of specific types of industries, for example, high-tech (Colombo et al, 2014;Rolandsson et al, 2011) versus low-tech and medium-tech sectors (Dodourova and Bevis, 2014), service-dominated industries versus manufacturing-based sectors (Hosseini and Narayanan, 2014), R&D-intensive in life sciences sector (Marangos and Warren, 2017), etc.…”

Section: Sectoral Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of the Literature on Open Innovation in SMEs

Usman¹,

Roijakkers²,

Vanhaverbeke³

et al. 2018

Researching Open Innovation in SMEs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter provides a systematic review of the open innovation (OI) research carried out within the context of small and mediumsized enterprises (SMEs). The chapter should provide an accurate understanding of current literature about OI in SMEs, and it elaborates many future research avenues. The recent increase in the number of publications in this field shows that it has gained the attention of the academicians. The existing research shows that SMEs organize and manage OI in an entirely different way from large companies. SMEs get involved in OI based on their own strategic needs, and OI mechanisms have to be designed differently for SMEs.

show abstract

“…Cheung and Lin 2004;Chen and Fang 2016) and the potential effects can be both positive and negative. There is a high degree of persistence in the innovative behavior of MNEs (Hosseini and Narayanan 2014). MNEs, through FDI, transfer knowledge, the results of innovation, to host countries and contribute to the technological upgrading of host countries (Findlay 1978;Wang et al 2014;Chen and Fang 2016).…”

Section: Fdi and Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%