2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of alternative fuel vehicles: Influence from neighbors, family and coworkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These preferences align with prior research in Norway [28] that found for EV owners, the media (inclusive of all types) was the most regarded information source, followed by family and friends. Social influence is another relevant driver for sales [53] and our results reveal that family and friends were well regarded as a source of information for female respondents. Interestingly, in Norway, only 1% of BEV owners would not buy an EV again [29], further evidencing that incentives and education, about potential benefits of EV ownership and ease of use, are policies that could help allay motorists' fears, enabling EVs to be the preferred choice.…”
Section: Access To Information: Impact On Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These preferences align with prior research in Norway [28] that found for EV owners, the media (inclusive of all types) was the most regarded information source, followed by family and friends. Social influence is another relevant driver for sales [53] and our results reveal that family and friends were well regarded as a source of information for female respondents. Interestingly, in Norway, only 1% of BEV owners would not buy an EV again [29], further evidencing that incentives and education, about potential benefits of EV ownership and ease of use, are policies that could help allay motorists' fears, enabling EVs to be the preferred choice.…”
Section: Access To Information: Impact On Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, different constructs related to emotional constructs or personal characteristics should be added to the original TPB to have a more comprehensive model for predicting customers' green hotels behaviors. It was also suggested to analyze direct or mediating effects of social influence, lifestyle, interpersonal relations, and anticipated emotions on pro-environmental behaviors and behavioral intentions in the hotel sector (Axsen, Orlebar, & Skippon, 2013;Jansson, Pettersson, Mannberg, Brännlund, & Lindgren, 2017;Rezvani, Jansson, & Bengtsson, 2017).…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason why people purchase sustainable products (both lowinvolvement and high-involvement) has been an important question for researchers in several different fields. For example, economists have focused on the role of financial dis/incentives (Mannberg, Jansson, Pettersson, Brännlund, & Lindgren, 2014), sociologists and marketing researchers have focused on the role of interpersonal influence (Jansson, Pettersson, Mannberg, Brännlund, & Lindgren, 2017) and psychologists have focused on personal psychological factors such as attitudes and values (Rezvani, Jansson, & Bodin, 2015). Although all perspectives bring important knowledge to the area, in this study we use a consumer behavior and environmental psychology perspective assuming that consumers are driven to behave based on different types of motivations in their psychological setup.…”
Section: Motivations Of Sustainable Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%