1989
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(89)90371-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorbate induced reconstruction by strong chemisorption: Ru(001)p(2×2)-O

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
105
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
12
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For transition metal surfaces the most stable oxygen structures are more open, whereas overlayers with smaller lattice constants, that are found in some cases at larger exposures, do not form islands on the bare surface; typical examples are the (2ϫ2) and (2ϫ1) overlayers on Ru͑0001͒. 30,31 ͑The (1ϫ1) structure prepared recently on this surface was obtained only by using NO 2 .͒ 32,33 Attractive nearest-neighbor interactions between O ad underlying the formation of the (1 ϫ1) structure on Al͑111͒ is therefore an important result. It is supported by a recent density functional calculation 5 in which the (1ϫ1) structure was found to be by 0.5 eV/atom more stable than a (2ϫ2) structure, which was explained by the unusual strength of the Al-O bond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For transition metal surfaces the most stable oxygen structures are more open, whereas overlayers with smaller lattice constants, that are found in some cases at larger exposures, do not form islands on the bare surface; typical examples are the (2ϫ2) and (2ϫ1) overlayers on Ru͑0001͒. 30,31 ͑The (1ϫ1) structure prepared recently on this surface was obtained only by using NO 2 .͒ 32,33 Attractive nearest-neighbor interactions between O ad underlying the formation of the (1 ϫ1) structure on Al͑111͒ is therefore an important result. It is supported by a recent density functional calculation 5 in which the (1ϫ1) structure was found to be by 0.5 eV/atom more stable than a (2ϫ2) structure, which was explained by the unusual strength of the Al-O bond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4d. The geometry of these structures corresponds to hydrogen and vacancies in fcc-hollow sites and O in hcp-hollow sites, as in the clean Ru surface [30]. The interesting observation is that in spite of the very high coverage of H, close to saturation, oxygen atom forbids the hydrogen atom taking six nearest fcc-hollow ruthenium sites.…”
Section: Effect Of Oxygen Impuritiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Past experiments have shown that they strongly influence the adsorption and diffusion of hydrogen [6,9]. Since atomic oxygen chemisorbs on Ru(001) hcp-hollow sites [30], it was even suggested that O may force H to adsorb on the hcp-hollow site [6].…”
Section: Effect Of Oxygen Impuritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Θ O =1/4, a (2 × 2)-O phase forms 25 . Here Θ O = 1 means that there are as many O atoms as there are Ru atoms in the top layer.…”
Section: Oxygen On Rutheniummentioning
confidence: 99%