2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorbents for the removal of arsenic, cadmium, and lead from contaminated waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
3
97
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of sorption capacity of Fe-leonardite with other adsorbents reported in the literature (Mohan and Pittman 2007;Yadanaparthi et al 2009) is complicated, mainly due to the variability of conditions under which sorption experiments were conducted, such as the range of initial concentrations the maximum capacity (qmax) obtained from Langmuir model varies over a wide range (Mohan and Pittman 2007). A comparison of qmax described in studies with similar arsenic initial concentrations than the used in the present work is summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The comparison of sorption capacity of Fe-leonardite with other adsorbents reported in the literature (Mohan and Pittman 2007;Yadanaparthi et al 2009) is complicated, mainly due to the variability of conditions under which sorption experiments were conducted, such as the range of initial concentrations the maximum capacity (qmax) obtained from Langmuir model varies over a wide range (Mohan and Pittman 2007). A comparison of qmax described in studies with similar arsenic initial concentrations than the used in the present work is summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the process of adsorption, the gas liquid solute gathers on the adsorbent surface which forms a molecular film of the adsorbent. For the removal of metal ions and other recalcitrant compound from the industrial effluents, activated charcoal, synthetic resins, agricultural waste and industrial waste used as adsorbent followed by physical, biological, and chemical methods (Yadanaparthi et al, 2009, Kwon et al, 2010and Gottipati et al, 2012. Activated carbon: Activated carbon is the commonly preferred adsorbent; its widespread use is restricted due to high cost.…”
Section: Low Cost Adsorbants and Their Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption ability of iron oxides has been exploited to remove contaminants such as arsenic, chromium, cadmium, lead and organic dyes from wastewater. 1, [9][10][11] The magnetic property of magnetite has also been exploited in the removal of contaminants from processed water, where the adsorbent could be readily magnetically recovered. 1 Among the ways to manifest reliably various functions of iron oxides, the biomimetic mineralization approach features precisely controllable, sustainable and low-cost and environmentally benign to access multi-functional materials with highly ordered structures in various applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%