2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption and removal of graphene dispersants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very recent example has shown how to exfoliate graphite in pure water by adjusting the sonication pressure and temperature and the GR storage conditions (0.0065 mg/mL), 9 but regardless, the most common approach is to help the exfoliation in water using additives. Some studies have pursued this by exfoliation of graphite in aqueous media with, for example, pyrene derivatives, [10][11][12] anionic surfactants, 13,14 polymers, 15,16 or proteins. [15][16][17][18] Therefore, whereas GO powders can be directly dispersed in the cell culture medium (CCM) or transferred through dilution from water, 8 pristine (chemically non-modified) GR in aqueous suspension is mostly handled with its accompanying dispersant, 15,17 or (hardly ever reported) GR powders directly dispersed in CCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent example has shown how to exfoliate graphite in pure water by adjusting the sonication pressure and temperature and the GR storage conditions (0.0065 mg/mL), 9 but regardless, the most common approach is to help the exfoliation in water using additives. Some studies have pursued this by exfoliation of graphite in aqueous media with, for example, pyrene derivatives, [10][11][12] anionic surfactants, 13,14 polymers, 15,16 or proteins. [15][16][17][18] Therefore, whereas GO powders can be directly dispersed in the cell culture medium (CCM) or transferred through dilution from water, 8 pristine (chemically non-modified) GR in aqueous suspension is mostly handled with its accompanying dispersant, 15,17 or (hardly ever reported) GR powders directly dispersed in CCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar effects have been seen in vacuum-filtered pristine graphene films. 19 The concentration of the graphene (stably dispersed, not agglomerated) is provided in Figure 4 as a function of irradiation time. As the irradiation time progresses, the amount of destabilized graphene coming out of dispersion increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of PVP to graphene in the dispersion is ~12:1; our prior study demonstrated that removal techniques such as vacuum filtration can remove bulk PVP, as shown via TGA data. 19 In order to evaluate the effect of irradiation on the dispersions, we remove the bulk PVP from the colloidal suspension of graphene/PVP using vacuum filtration, followed by re-dispersion and freeze-drying (following our prior procedures). 19 We hypothesize that UV degradation occurs not only on the bulk PVP but also on the PVP that is adsorbed onto graphene surface which allows for PVP desorption; this would imply that the PVP coverage of the stabilized graphene would decrease as a function of irradiation time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations