2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2016.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption behaviour of Fe(II) and Cr(VI) on activated carbon: Surface chemistry, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3b). The same results were observed in the works of Cheng et al (2016) and Maneechakr and Karnjanakom (2017). To further understand the mechanisms on how the Cr 6+ ions get adsorbed on the surface of the MFHAC, FTIR studies were employed on the optimized MFHAC, before and after Cr 6+ adsorption.…”
Section: Crsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…3b). The same results were observed in the works of Cheng et al (2016) and Maneechakr and Karnjanakom (2017). To further understand the mechanisms on how the Cr 6+ ions get adsorbed on the surface of the MFHAC, FTIR studies were employed on the optimized MFHAC, before and after Cr 6+ adsorption.…”
Section: Crsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Based on the R 2 values obtained from various isotherms studied in this work, the best fitted adsorption isotherms were to be in the order of prediction precision: Langmuir > Temkin > Freundlich > D‐R isotherms and their corresponding R 2 values are 0.99, 0.92, 0.91, and 0.81, respectively. Iron (II) adsorption capacity of porous CS, 51.81 mg/g, obtained in this study is really high when compared to the other activated carbon studied for these applications …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The effect of initial iron (II) concentrations on adsorption capacity of porous CS in the range of 25 to 100 mg/L of iron (II) was investigated at temperature: 30°C, pH: 3.5, and adsorbent dose: 1.1 g/L. The net adsorption capacity (mg iron (II)/g porous CS) was higher at higher initial concentration of iron (II) . The initial iron (II) concentration provides the necessary driving force to overcome the resistance to the mass transfer of adsorbate from the bulk solution to the surface of the adsorbent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from Fig. 5c that the percent removal of Fe(II) and Cu(II) increased with the increase in temperature, indicating that their adsorption onto adsorbents is endothermic [46,47]. For Ni(II) however, the percent removal decreased, indicating exothermic adsorption of Ni(II) [37].…”
Section: Effect Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 88%