2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2015.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption–desorption noise in microfluidic biosensors operating in multianalyte environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23,112 Another example for conventional FET-sensors is that the surface layer could be modified with a biomoleculepermeable polymer layer which is proposed to operate by extending the effective distance over which charges are screened within the layer. 113 A final example of particular interest is the use of frequency-mode detection, 15,46,[114][115][116][117] where the current response is measured in the frequency domain instead of the time-domain (details can be found in ESI 6 †). The lack of wide-spread adoption of alternative operating methods may be due to: complexity, with the additional required steps required making them less commercially appealing; a lack of awareness in a rapidly changing field; or lack of reproducibility.…”
Section: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23,112 Another example for conventional FET-sensors is that the surface layer could be modified with a biomoleculepermeable polymer layer which is proposed to operate by extending the effective distance over which charges are screened within the layer. 113 A final example of particular interest is the use of frequency-mode detection, 15,46,[114][115][116][117] where the current response is measured in the frequency domain instead of the time-domain (details can be found in ESI 6 †). The lack of wide-spread adoption of alternative operating methods may be due to: complexity, with the additional required steps required making them less commercially appealing; a lack of awareness in a rapidly changing field; or lack of reproducibility.…”
Section: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,21 The EDL structure in turn can be affected by dense biomolecule layers through ion-exclusion; mathematical models incorporating ion-exclusion effects have been shown to describe experimental signal measurements of DNA hybridisation better than more conventional EDL models. 15 Recent experimental work recognises the importance of ion dynamics in BioFET engineering, with deterministic information extracted from BioFET signals in the frequency domain of the response 15,22,23 which has been explained as a result of adsorption-desorption noise of biomolecules 24 and perturbed charge fluctuations in the EDL. 25 Experiments have shown a decrease in low frequency noise with increased ionic strength due to increased screening competition between the EDL and the semiconductor device.…”
Section: Importance Of Edl Structure and Ion Dynamics In The Interfacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [17] the authors assumed thermal noise of the equivalent impedance representing the charged antigen protein layer bound to the sensor's surface as the relevant noise source, obtaining Lorentzian-shaped spectral profiles. Other contributions were later introduced by considering mass transfer limitations [25], [28]- [30] and charge fluctuations across the Debye length [24], which result into additional and/or frequency shifted Lorentzian contributions with respect to the former model of [17]. Similar spectra have been calculated in [23], by solving numerically the mass transfer limited stochastic problem for affinity-based biosensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%