2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption Interface-Induced H...F Charge Transfer in Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Perfluorinated Gas Separation

Abstract: Fluorinated electron gases (F-gases) are widely used in semiconductor manufacturing because of their unique plasma reactivity with silicon-based semiconductor materials. However, the low conversion efficiency of these F-gases in the plasma process makes the vent gases contain a certain concentration of F-gases, which causes environmental pollution and global warming. In this study, three ultramicroporous metal–organic frameworks M3(HCOO)6 (M = Co, Ni, Mn) were prepared for the separation and purification of F-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to Zn-MOF-74’s low adsorption capacity and weak adsorption affinity toward NF 3 , its selectivity for NF 3 /N 2 is only 2.8 (Figure d) at 298 K and 100 kPa. Co-MOF-74 displays the highest NF 3 /N 2 selectivity among the four MOFs studied and outperforms several materials previously reported in the literature for NF 3 /N 2 selectivity, namely, POPTrB-8F (5.7), Co 3 (HCOO) 6 (19.2), Mn 3 (HCOO) 6 (20.0), Ni 3 (HCOO) 6 (30.0), SBMOF-1 (21.0), Ni-MOF (35.8), NH 2 –Ni-MOF (32.4), PC-750 (61.4), and others. The adsorption curve indicates Co-MOF-74 has a stronger affinity for NF 3 at low pressures, with an adsorption capacity of up to 54.0 cm 3 g –1 (2.41 mmol g –1 ) at 10 kPa.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Owing to Zn-MOF-74’s low adsorption capacity and weak adsorption affinity toward NF 3 , its selectivity for NF 3 /N 2 is only 2.8 (Figure d) at 298 K and 100 kPa. Co-MOF-74 displays the highest NF 3 /N 2 selectivity among the four MOFs studied and outperforms several materials previously reported in the literature for NF 3 /N 2 selectivity, namely, POPTrB-8F (5.7), Co 3 (HCOO) 6 (19.2), Mn 3 (HCOO) 6 (20.0), Ni 3 (HCOO) 6 (30.0), SBMOF-1 (21.0), Ni-MOF (35.8), NH 2 –Ni-MOF (32.4), PC-750 (61.4), and others. The adsorption curve indicates Co-MOF-74 has a stronger affinity for NF 3 at low pressures, with an adsorption capacity of up to 54.0 cm 3 g –1 (2.41 mmol g –1 ) at 10 kPa.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Considering the establishment of permanent microporosity and suitable pore aperture size, C 2 ClF 5 and C 3 F 8 adsorption isotherms were collected at 298 K for ZSM-5 and TMAZ-Xs (Figure 3E,F environment, which enhanced F…H/Cl…H van der Waals force interactions between C 2 ClF 5 and the abundant hydrogen atoms lining the pore surfaces due to TMA + enrichment. 38 The pristine ZSM-5 zeolite exhibits large pore apertures ($6.5 Å, Figure 2E) and poor hydrogen atoms that are more match with the relatively larger tortuosity. 39 The diffusion through the sinusoidal channel is invariably lengthier than through straight channels, owing to the greater tortuosity of the sinusoidal channels, which forces molecules to collide and rebound more frequently, thereby reducing the molecular diffusion rate.…”
Section: Equilibrium and Kinetic Adsorption Of Tmaz-2 And Zsm-5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorine-containing cleaning gases mainly include CF 4 , hexafluoroethane (C 2 F 6 ), sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ), and other perfluorocarbons. 17 Porous adsorbents such as zeolites, [18][19][20][21] metal-organic frameworks, [22][23][24] carbon nanotubes, [25][26][27][28] and amorphous activated carbon 29 are commonly used for adsorbing and separating fluorine components in gas mixtures. For example, Skarmoutsos et al 25 have investigated the adsorption and separation performance of carbon nanomaterials and metal-organic frameworks in CF 4 -SF 6 and CF 4 -N 2 fluid mixtures using Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%