2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(02)00063-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption isotherms of fractal surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, the FHH model is widely used and has been shown to be the most effective method for describing the irregular geometric and structural properties of shale [44][45][46]. Fractal dimension D can be calculated independently via the FHH equation combined with N2 adsorption isotherm data and the detailed process to derive fractal dimension D is discussed in Qi et al [47].…”
Section: Organic Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, the FHH model is widely used and has been shown to be the most effective method for describing the irregular geometric and structural properties of shale [44][45][46]. Fractal dimension D can be calculated independently via the FHH equation combined with N2 adsorption isotherm data and the detailed process to derive fractal dimension D is discussed in Qi et al [47].…”
Section: Organic Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,35,36 Among which, the FHH method has been widely and successfully used for calculating fractal dimension of porous materials using N 2 adsorption data, 18,28,37,38 which is also employed in this study. The FHH model can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Fractal Dimension Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A = D − 3) can effectively perform the realistic fractal dimension. 18,29,38 Thus, in this study, the expression "A = D − 3" is adopted for the FHH model.…”
Section: Fractal Dimension Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D s values that were obtained by fitting N 2 adsorption data for three shales to the FHH isotherm equation were lower (2.39, 2.24 and 2.20) than those obtained by smallangle neutron scattering (SANS; 2.83, 2.75 and 2.59) [66]. The differences were explained by showing that the theoretical adsorption isotherms that were obtained using a power-law distribution of uncoupled spherical pores exhibited the same general features as the experimental isotherms [66].…”
Section: Fractal Analysis Applied To Adsorption Datamentioning
confidence: 59%