CH 4 . Depending on the process used during production, along with the type of fermented material, the composition of the produced gas can vary significantly. However, from an anaerobic digester, a significant portion of the produced gas will always be CO 2 . In order to enhance the gas stream for energy production processes, an adsorption process can be used to purify the individual components [1]. Purification of the gas mixtures to produce two high purity gas streams has the added benefit of producing a higher value product of close to pure methane along with a CO 2 stream that could potentially be sequestered, preventing the release of CO 2 into the atmosphere and hence reducing the environmental impact of the process. This is referred to as biogas upgrading and, as a result of its green power generation credentials, the optimisation of the upgrading process has recently begun to attract interest as an area of research [1][2][3]. The optimal technology for biogas upgrading is highly dependent on the specific biogas process/plant. The biogas feedstock, the scale of the plant and the acceptable concentration of impurities in the product streams are all important factors in selecting an upgrading technology. A variety of technologies have been investigated and, in certain cases, implemented such as water scrubbing and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) [4], cryogenic separation, chemical absorption, physical absorption and membrane separation [5,6]. A review comparing the cost and investigating the appropriate utilisation of the various approaches was recently published by Sun et al. [7]. From this review it is clear that further work is required to establish the potential of the different technologies if biogas upgrading is to find more widespread application. There are also several recent reports that propose systems to lower the cost of gas separation. In 2015 Kim et al. [8] proposed a four column PSA process using a carbon molecular sieve as adsorbent that only had a selectivity for CO 2 over CH 4 of 1.9. Grande Abstract Three materials are directly compared for their potential for biogas purification: 13X zeolite, microporous activated carbon and mesoporous activated carbon impregnated with polyethyleneimine. The amine-impregnated material shows the highest selectivity for CO 2 over CH 4 but this should be balanced by the higher operating temperature required. All three materials could be used for biogas purification with the advantages and diasadvantages clearly presented.