2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00706-014-1382-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of anionic surfactant at the electrode–NaClO4 solution interface

Abstract: Adsorption of 1-decanesulfonic acid at the electrode–NaClO4 solution interface was determined by double-layer differential capacity measurements. At potentials less than −1,200 mV, the adsorption of the anionic surfactant on the electrode does not occur. Low concentrations of the anionic surfactant (below cmc) causes slight changes in the zero charge potential, Ez, and the surface tension at this potential, γz. The adsorption of the anionic surfactant was analyzed using the constants obtained from the followin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be only partially explained by the difference in the molecular mass of primary dopants, since all of them are monovalent and if the rates of polymer formation are the same, the highest mass is expected for the PEDOT/DS system. The opposite observation indicates the inhibitory effect of DS on the electropolymerization of EDOT, which can be explained by the adsorption of the surfactant molecules on electrode/electrolyte and polymer/electrolyte interface resulting in the modification of surface characteristics and electron transfer effectiveness [41]. These phenomena lead to the decrease in the rate of film formation in a similar way as it was reported in case of other surfactants, e.g.…”
Section: Electrochemical Polymerization Of Edotsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This can be only partially explained by the difference in the molecular mass of primary dopants, since all of them are monovalent and if the rates of polymer formation are the same, the highest mass is expected for the PEDOT/DS system. The opposite observation indicates the inhibitory effect of DS on the electropolymerization of EDOT, which can be explained by the adsorption of the surfactant molecules on electrode/electrolyte and polymer/electrolyte interface resulting in the modification of surface characteristics and electron transfer effectiveness [41]. These phenomena lead to the decrease in the rate of film formation in a similar way as it was reported in case of other surfactants, e.g.…”
Section: Electrochemical Polymerization Of Edotsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…[21][22][23][24][25][26] The Frumkin isotherm ( Figure 6) constants were determined from the equation: and adsorption factor -A F obtained in linear tests of the Frumkin isotherm are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfactants and humic substances are other types of interfering substances occurring in natural water samples. They can adsorb on the surface of the electrode, which reduces access to it and may make it difficult to form a metallic film on it [ 44 ]. In order to investigate the effect of these substances on the cadmium peak current, experiments with non-ionic surfactant Triton X-100, cationic surfactant CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide), anionic surfactant SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate), and biosurfactant Rhamnolipids were carried out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%