2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of protein antigen to the cationic liposome adjuvant CAF®01 is required for induction of Th1 and Th17 responses but not for antibody induction

Abstract: Graphical abstract Non-adsorbed antigen administered with the depot-forming, cationic adjuvant formulation (CAF®01) results in low T cell responses, while adsorbed antigen increases T cell responses. Especially Th17 responses benefit from high adsorption. Abstract created with biorender.com.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, only at 7 days after immunization, the levels of IgG and SIgA of the mice immunized with SeL or HiSeL and vaccine had a better promotion effect than those immunized with L. brevis 23017 and vaccine, whereas the mice immunized with L. brevis 23017 and vaccine were slightly increased when compared with the mice immunized with vaccine alone, suggesting that SeL and HiSeL induced immune response faster than L. brevis 23017, which also shows that SeL and HiSeL effectively made up for the weaknesses of slow IgG antibody production ( 58 ) and no SIgA production of alum adjuvant. We speculate that the reason for inducing a more rapid antibody production is that lactic acid bacteria and selenium have a synergistic effect in improving the antibody level ( 59 ), and then, they work together to accelerate the production of IgG antibody by B lymphocytes and the increment of SIgA antibody by the intestinal mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, only at 7 days after immunization, the levels of IgG and SIgA of the mice immunized with SeL or HiSeL and vaccine had a better promotion effect than those immunized with L. brevis 23017 and vaccine, whereas the mice immunized with L. brevis 23017 and vaccine were slightly increased when compared with the mice immunized with vaccine alone, suggesting that SeL and HiSeL induced immune response faster than L. brevis 23017, which also shows that SeL and HiSeL effectively made up for the weaknesses of slow IgG antibody production ( 58 ) and no SIgA production of alum adjuvant. We speculate that the reason for inducing a more rapid antibody production is that lactic acid bacteria and selenium have a synergistic effect in improving the antibody level ( 59 ), and then, they work together to accelerate the production of IgG antibody by B lymphocytes and the increment of SIgA antibody by the intestinal mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the case of the CAF®01 formulation, we also cannot rule out the effect of the antigen adsorption into the liposome formulation. Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that changes of the electrostatic interactions between antigens and CAF®01 can lead to different immune responses [48] . Thus, the authors associated efficient Th1/Th17-type responses to higher adsorption rates of the antigen into the vaccine formulation, in inverse correlation with antibody titers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal dose of an antigen, whether protein-, peptide- or nucleic-acid-based, varies from antigen to antigen and (unfortunately) from species to species. Most important, however, is that the optimum antigen dose is not the same for all vaccine technologies, and for some technologies, it has a major impact on the T/B cell induction balance, as illustrated with CAF01 by Wørzner et al [ 38 ], meaning that antigen dose optimization should be linked to the expected correlates of protection for the vaccine. Sampling timepoint.…”
Section: What To Think About When Designing Comparative Vaccine Techn...mentioning
confidence: 99%