1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)7:2<115::aid-hbm5>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult age differences in the functional neuroanatomy of verbal recognition memory

Abstract: Adult age differences are frequently observed in the performance of memory tasks, but the changes in neural function mediating these differences are largely unknown. We used (H2)15O positron emission tomography (PET) to measure changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during Encoding, Baseline, and Retrieval conditions of a recognition memory task. Twelve young adults (20-29 years) and 12 older adults (62-79 years) participated. During each task condition, participants made a two-choice manual response t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

24
203
4
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(93 reference statements)
24
203
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it replicates prior results suggesting more bilateral activation in older adults compared to unilateral activation in younger adults (Cabeza et al, 1997a;Grady et al, 1994;Madden et al, 1997Madden et al, , 1999Nielson et al, 2002;Schachter et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it replicates prior results suggesting more bilateral activation in older adults compared to unilateral activation in younger adults (Cabeza et al, 1997a;Grady et al, 1994;Madden et al, 1997Madden et al, , 1999Nielson et al, 2002;Schachter et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More specifically, although the nature of the tasks used to study age-related changes in cognition and neurophysiology within imaging paradigms have varied from facial recognition to verbal working memory, some task nonspecific findings have begun to emerge. Older participants exhibit extraneous areas of activation and greater bilateral activation in functional homologues (i.e., analogous brain regions in the contralateral hemisphere) where younger adults exhibited asymmetrical activation (Cabeza, 2002;Cabeza et al, 1997b;Grady et al, 1994;Madden et al, 1997Madden et al, , 1999Nielson et al, 2002;Schachter et al, 1996, but see Grady et al, 1995;Jonides et al, 2000;Rypma and D'Esposito, 2000). A number of the imaging studies also report differences between younger and older adults in the inferior parietal lobule and the dorsomedial nucleus of the thalamus (DiGirolamo et al, 2001;Grady et al, 1994Grady et al, , 1995Grossman et al, 2001;Madden et al, 1997Madden et al, , 1999Nielson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, aging is associated with reduced activation of brain regions that were also active in young people (Grady et al, 1994(Grady et al, , 1995(Grady et al, , 1998Nagahama et al, 1997;Esposito et al, 1999). Second, there was activation of brain areas that were not engaged in young subjects (Grady et al, 1992;Cabeza et al, 1997a;Esposito et al, 1999;Madden et al, 1999;McIntosh et al, 1999;ReuterLorenz et al, 2000). Third, changes were seen in the correlated activity among regions, with differences in coactivation in aging (Cabeza et al, 1997b;McIntosh et al, 1999).…”
Section: N100 Activity During Memory Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to young subjects, elderly subjects exhibit reduced activity in several regions during encoding of memory items and incomplete regional activation during recall (Grady et al, 1995). Elderly subjects also engage additional brain areas when performing at comparable levels to young subjects (Cabeza et al, 1997a;Madden et al, 1999;McIntosh et al, 1999;Reuter-Lorenz et al, 2000), and have different functional correlations between brain regions (Cabeza et al, 1997b;McIntosh et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, older adults sometimes have increased right frontal activity during encoding compared with young adults (Rosen et al, 2002). Similarly, retrieval has been associated typically with right frontal activity in young adults but a recruitment of both right and left frontal regions in older adults (Backman et al, 1997;Grady, Bernstein, Siegenthaler, & Beig, 2002;Madden et al, 1999). This consistent demonstration of bilateral activity in frontal regions during retrieval in older adults compared with typically right-lateralized frontal recruitment in the young has led to the suggestion that aging is associated with a reduction in hemispheric asymmetry (HAROLD; Cabeza, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%