2007
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult Lead Exposure: Time for Change

Abstract: We have assembled this mini-monograph on adult lead exposure to provide guidance to clinicians and public health professionals, to summarize recent thinking on lead biomarkers and their relevance to epidemiologic research, and to review two key lead-related outcomes, namely, cardiovascular and cognitive. The lead standards of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration are woefully out of date given the growing evidence of the health effects of lead at levels of exposure previously thought to be saf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
55
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…New findings of lead-related adverse reproductive outcomes have led to recommendations for women who are pregnant or of childbearing age to avoid occupational lead exposure, even at blood lead concentrations <10 µ g/dl 16,65) . A growing body of scientific evidence suggests that occupational exposure to 'safe' lead levels may not prevent toxicity, both in the acute setting and from cumulative doses 69) . In addition, there is no evidence of a threshold below which lead has no adverse health effects 70) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New findings of lead-related adverse reproductive outcomes have led to recommendations for women who are pregnant or of childbearing age to avoid occupational lead exposure, even at blood lead concentrations <10 µ g/dl 16,65) . A growing body of scientific evidence suggests that occupational exposure to 'safe' lead levels may not prevent toxicity, both in the acute setting and from cumulative doses 69) . In addition, there is no evidence of a threshold below which lead has no adverse health effects 70) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compares to 5–10 μg/dL for 40 working years associated with Schwartz and Hu’s (2007) recommended CBLI of 200–400 μg-years/dL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The PEL, REL, and TLV may prevent overt symptoms of lead poisoning, but do not protect workers from lead's contributions to conditions such as hypertension, renal dysfunction, reproductive, and cognitive effects [Brown-Williams et al 2009;Holland and Cawthorn 2016;Institute of Medicine 2012;Schwartz and Hu 2007;Schwartz and Stewart 2007]. Generally, acute lead poisoning with symptoms has been documented in persons having BLLs above 70 µg/dL.…”
Section: Health Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%