2014 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccnc.2014.6785481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advance bandwidth reservation with deadline constraint in high-performance networks

Abstract: In high-performance networks with both advance and immediate reservations, activating an advance reservation may result in the preemption of some ongoing data transfers based on immediate reservations due to insufficient bandwidth. To minimize such service disruption, we explore the interactions between advance and immediate reservations, and propose an integrated reservation solution with two components: (i) a scheduling algorithm based on statistical analysis of reservation dynamics that routes deadline-cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different algorithms for in‐advance scheduling are described in Lin and Wu, Dharam et al, Sahni et al() Lin and Wu considered an exhaustive combination of different path and bandwidth constraints and formulated 4 types of advance bandwidth scheduling problems, with the objective to minimize the data transfer end time for a given transfer request with a prespecified data size. Dharam et al considered deadline‐constrained in‐advance scheduling with the objective of finding a path to transfer data of a given size before a specified deadline by accounting estimated in‐progress on‐demand reservations in future time with a statistical scheme; such on‐demand reservations might otherwise be interrupted or preempted by newly activated in‐advance reservation. In our SFBR, in‐advance scheduling does not neglect on‐demand reservations in progress at all.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different algorithms for in‐advance scheduling are described in Lin and Wu, Dharam et al, Sahni et al() Lin and Wu considered an exhaustive combination of different path and bandwidth constraints and formulated 4 types of advance bandwidth scheduling problems, with the objective to minimize the data transfer end time for a given transfer request with a prespecified data size. Dharam et al considered deadline‐constrained in‐advance scheduling with the objective of finding a path to transfer data of a given size before a specified deadline by accounting estimated in‐progress on‐demand reservations in future time with a statistical scheme; such on‐demand reservations might otherwise be interrupted or preempted by newly activated in‐advance reservation. In our SFBR, in‐advance scheduling does not neglect on‐demand reservations in progress at all.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, some studies have introduced a model whereby a transfer request must either be completed by a user-specified deadline or rejected if the Manuscript deadline cannot be met [9], [10]. Note that in this model, it is not necessary to shorten the transfer time below its deadline and it is preferable to accept more requests, thereby reducing the number of rejected requests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that request blocking and spectrum utilization are directly related to network operators' revenue. Hence, researchers have tried to address hybrid IR/AR service provisioning in various networks [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RELATED WORK Based on various networks, previous studies have considered the admission control, spectrum partition, routing and scheduling for IR or AR requests, and tried to limit the service preemption rate of IR ones [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation