2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3011705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Deep Learning-Based Computational Offloading for Multilevel Vehicular Edge-Cloud Computing Networks

Abstract: The promise of low latency connectivity and efficient bandwidth utilization has driven the recent shift from vehicular cloud computing (VCC) towards vehicular edge computing (VEC). This paper presents an advanced deep learning-based computational offloading algorithm for multilevel vehicular edge-cloud computing networks. To conserve energy and guarantee the efficient utilization of shared resources among multiple vehicles, an integration model of computational offloading, and resource allocation is formulated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Power/energy [28][29][30] QoS [33][34][35] Delay [25,26,28,[35][36][37][38][39] QoE and user satisfaction [34,37] Network/system utility [26,33,37,39,40] Reliability [20] However, at the same time, they are required to perform many intensive computations as part of the network [27]. Hence, authors in [28][29][30][31] try to optimize energy and power consumption in their resource allocation schemes.…”
Section: Table 2 Classification Of Framework According To Their Optimization Goals Optimization Goal Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Power/energy [28][29][30] QoS [33][34][35] Delay [25,26,28,[35][36][37][38][39] QoE and user satisfaction [34,37] Network/system utility [26,33,37,39,40] Reliability [20] However, at the same time, they are required to perform many intensive computations as part of the network [27]. Hence, authors in [28][29][30][31] try to optimize energy and power consumption in their resource allocation schemes.…”
Section: Table 2 Classification Of Framework According To Their Optimization Goals Optimization Goal Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power/energy [28][29][30] QoS [33][34][35] Delay [25,26,28,[35][36][37][38][39] QoE and user satisfaction [34,37] Network/system utility [26,33,37,39,40] Reliability [20] However, at the same time, they are required to perform many intensive computations as part of the network [27]. Hence, authors in [28][29][30][31] try to optimize energy and power consumption in their resource allocation schemes. Optimizing power includes various factors like transmission power, uploading time, offloading ratio, local CPU frequency, etc and all these factors need to be considered while formulating the energy/power optimization problem.…”
Section: Table 2 Classification Of Framework According To Their Optimization Goals Optimization Goal Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the experimental results show that the performance of the proposed algorithm is better than other benchmark algorithms, the offloading of dependent tasks is not considered. Khayyat et al [18] proposed a distributed deep learning algorithm to optimize the delay and energy consumption. The simulation results show that the algorithm has faster convergence speed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The optimization objective mainly focused on either execution delay [13,14] or energy consumption [15,16], instead of the joint optimization of offloading failure rate and energy consumption [17,18]. 2 Most work only considered computation offloading strategy in the static environment [19][20][21], instead of dynamic offloading strategy with the change of vehicle positions in different time slots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%