2022
DOI: 10.3390/ma15072361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Estimation of Compressive Strength and Fracture Behavior in Ceramic Honeycombs by Polarimetry Measurements of Similar Epoxy Resin Honeycombs

Abstract: Finding a non-destructive characterization method for cellular ceramics’ compressive strength and fracture behavior has been a challenge for material scientists for years. However, for transparent materials, internal stresses can be determined by the non-destructive photoelastic measurements. We propose a novel approach to correlate the photoelastic stresses of polymer (epoxy resin) prototypes with the mechanical properties of ceramics (alumina). Regular and inverse epoxy honeycombs were 3D-printed via stereol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of the surface stress with increasing θ angle shows, on the one hand, a more homogeneous stress distribution in the auxetic region and, on the other hand, higher absolute stress in the honeycomb area. This also correlates with the fracture behavior of ceramic honeycombs, as described by Köllner et al [20] Thus, the honeycomb specimen mainly exhibited the fracture in the center of the upper strut, which is consistent with the stress-exceeded point of this FEM simulation. Furthermore, this simulation indicates or explains that auxetic structures achieve higher strength values than honeycomb structures.…”
Section: Influence Of the Structural θ Angle On The Mechanical Proper...supporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The evolution of the surface stress with increasing θ angle shows, on the one hand, a more homogeneous stress distribution in the auxetic region and, on the other hand, higher absolute stress in the honeycomb area. This also correlates with the fracture behavior of ceramic honeycombs, as described by Köllner et al [20] Thus, the honeycomb specimen mainly exhibited the fracture in the center of the upper strut, which is consistent with the stress-exceeded point of this FEM simulation. Furthermore, this simulation indicates or explains that auxetic structures achieve higher strength values than honeycomb structures.…”
Section: Influence Of the Structural θ Angle On The Mechanical Proper...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The issue has already been observed on alumina auxetic and honeycomb structures, where this effect was due to the different mechanical stress modes between auxetic and honeycomb specimens. [ 20 ] Especially the stress‐excessive points showed compressive stresses in the auxetic case and tensile stresses in the honeycomb case, which lead to higher strength for the auxetic specimens. [ 20,49,50 ] σc=σ0*(tl)2*13false(hl+sinθfalse)sinθ…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations