2017
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201700257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced immunocapture of milk‐borne Salmonella by microfluidic magnetically stabilized fluidized bed

Abstract: The success of microfluidic immunocapture based on magnetic beads depends primarily on a sophisticated microscale separation system and on the quality of the magnetic immunosorbent. A microfluidic chip containing a magnetically stabilized fluidized bed (μMSFB), developed for the capture and on‐chip amplification of bacteria, was recently described by Pereiro et al.. The present work shows the thorough development of anti‐Salmonella magnetic immunosorbents with the optimal capture efficiency and selectivity. Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, much effort has been focused on novel sample pretreatment methods that are potential to be integrated into biosensors, including IMS (Du et al., 2018), microfluidic separation (He et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2019; Srbova et al., 2018), electrophoresis (Nguyen, Nguyen, Bui, & Seo, 2019; Zhang, Luo, et al., 2018), acoustophoresis (Ngamsom, Lopez‐Martinez, et al., 2016), magnetophoresis (Ngamsom, Esfahani, et al., 2016), and magnetic ionic liquid‐based extraction (Hice, Clark, Anderson, & Brehm‐Stecher, 2019). Among them, IMS has been regarded as one of the most useful tools for selective capture, separation, and concentration of Salmonella prior to detection.…”
Section: Challenges In the Development Of Salmonella Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, much effort has been focused on novel sample pretreatment methods that are potential to be integrated into biosensors, including IMS (Du et al., 2018), microfluidic separation (He et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2019; Srbova et al., 2018), electrophoresis (Nguyen, Nguyen, Bui, & Seo, 2019; Zhang, Luo, et al., 2018), acoustophoresis (Ngamsom, Lopez‐Martinez, et al., 2016), magnetophoresis (Ngamsom, Esfahani, et al., 2016), and magnetic ionic liquid‐based extraction (Hice, Clark, Anderson, & Brehm‐Stecher, 2019). Among them, IMS has been regarded as one of the most useful tools for selective capture, separation, and concentration of Salmonella prior to detection.…”
Section: Challenges In the Development Of Salmonella Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the non-specific enrichment easily misses the target bacteria and reduces the accuracy of Salmonella detection. Nowadays, many kinds of Salmonella sorting technologies have been developed, such as magnetic separation, electrophoresis, microfluidic screening and so on (Figure 4A) [72,[134][135][136]. Immunomagnetic separation is the widely recognized method for the isolation and enrichment of Salmonella.…”
Section: Sample Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the problem of developing microfluidic platforms for the on-site detection of common foodborne pathogens in milk samples has attracted great interest in the recent literature. Typically, these platforms have been designed for the detection of E. coli [ 86 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 ], S. aureus [ 94 , 95 , 96 ], Listeria [ 97 , 98 , 99 ], and Salmonella [ 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 ].…”
Section: Microfluidic Platforms For Milk Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many microfluidic devices have been proposed for the detection of Salmonella in milk samples. Generally speaking, these devices use colorimetric, immunoassay (microchip-based, thread-based, rotary paper-based), EC biosensing, fluorescence, and PCR amplification combined with LIF [ 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 ]. For example, An et al [ 108 ] presented a microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platform in which a microfluidic droplet device was used to encapsulate single Salmonella cells in a growth medium and the encapsulated droplets were then collected.…”
Section: Microfluidic Platforms For Milk Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%