2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-1007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare

Abstract: I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most reference cases for economic evaluation recommend or require that the same discount rate should be applied to both costs and benefits. Jönsson et al 9 question this in the case of advanced therapy medicinal products, where often there is a large upfront cost if the therapy is delivered in a single dose, with benefits stretching far into the future. They also point out that there is a minority of national HTA bodies (eg, in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Poland) that allow benefits to be discounted at a lower rate than costs.…”
Section: Time Horizon and Discount Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most reference cases for economic evaluation recommend or require that the same discount rate should be applied to both costs and benefits. Jönsson et al 9 question this in the case of advanced therapy medicinal products, where often there is a large upfront cost if the therapy is delivered in a single dose, with benefits stretching far into the future. They also point out that there is a minority of national HTA bodies (eg, in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Poland) that allow benefits to be discounted at a lower rate than costs.…”
Section: Time Horizon and Discount Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marsden et al 8 question this argument and suggest that patients with rare genetic diseases, along with the gene replacement therapies they use, present a unique set of conditions that warrant equally unique analytic approaches to estimating value for money. Furthermore, Jönsson et al 9 suggest that in the case of advanced therapy medicinal products, which include gene therapy approaches, 3 issues pose challenges for current methods: the uncertainty about future costs and benefits, aspects of value that are not captured in the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and the social and ethical aspects of the implications of discounting. Finally, Garrison et al 10 argue that the novel aspects of value provided by gene therapies justify a higher (cost-effectiveness) decision-making threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frameworks used by EU HTA bodies are typically based on comparative clinical benefit assessment and economic evaluation (cost utility analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis) as the key methods for defining the value of new technologies. This may involve reflecting health gain as quality-adjusted life years (QALY), or an alternative patient-relevant outcome, such as life years gained (LYG) [2].…”
Section: Hta Of Atmps In the Big 5eumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), are a heterogeneous class of medicinal products that includes products based on genes (gene therapy medical products), cells (somatic cell therapy medical products) and tissues (tissue engineering medical products) [1]. ATMPs may offer the potential of a one-time cure and are considered disruptive technologies [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in science mean we have new medicines for previously untreatable diseases, often very specific to a small sub-set of patients. Medicines are being developed to treat patients earlier on in the disease pathway, with novel mechanisms of action that in some cases are potentially curative [4][5][6][7]. There are significant developments in areas like gene-editing technology, stem cell treatments, exosomes and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%