2022
DOI: 10.4271/2022-01-0384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Turbulence Model for SI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty NG Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 0D prediction appears quite poor during the intake phase, and this is due to its incapability to reproduce multiple and unstructured tumble eddies generated during this phase in the engine under study. 32 The model accuracy drastically improves during the compression stroke, where tumble collapse toward TDC is quite well captured. Figures 9 and 10 also depict the comparisons between the results of the presented K-k-T-S model and the ones of the K-k-T variant.…”
Section: Results and Discussion On Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 0D prediction appears quite poor during the intake phase, and this is due to its incapability to reproduce multiple and unstructured tumble eddies generated during this phase in the engine under study. 32 The model accuracy drastically improves during the compression stroke, where tumble collapse toward TDC is quite well captured. Figures 9 and 10 also depict the comparisons between the results of the presented K-k-T-S model and the ones of the K-k-T variant.…”
Section: Results and Discussion On Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This section presents the predictions of the proposed 0D flow/turbulence model at two operating conditions and compares them to the results obtained via 3D-CFD simulations, widely detailed in Riccardi et al 32 The operating conditions considered are at 1200 and 1900 rpm, whose main engine settings are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Results and Discussion On Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation