2008
DOI: 10.1117/1.2990739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced ultraviolet cross-link process and materials for global planarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stripping thickness of less than 5 nm was considered suitable for avoiding the intermixing between EUV-pullulan14 and the spin-on hard mask underlayer material in lithography. 39) In addition, the dissolution rate of EUV-pullulan14 was approximately 240 nm/min at the doses of 2-4 µC/cm 2 ; it then decreased rapidly as the dose increased to more than 6 µC/cm 2 . By carefully designing the polymer molecular weight and the concentration of -OH groups in pullulan derivatives, it was confirmed to be possible to control the dissolution rate of EUV-pullulan14.…”
Section: Eb Cross-linking Reactions and Dissolution Ratementioning
confidence: 94%
“…A stripping thickness of less than 5 nm was considered suitable for avoiding the intermixing between EUV-pullulan14 and the spin-on hard mask underlayer material in lithography. 39) In addition, the dissolution rate of EUV-pullulan14 was approximately 240 nm/min at the doses of 2-4 µC/cm 2 ; it then decreased rapidly as the dose increased to more than 6 µC/cm 2 . By carefully designing the polymer molecular weight and the concentration of -OH groups in pullulan derivatives, it was confirmed to be possible to control the dissolution rate of EUV-pullulan14.…”
Section: Eb Cross-linking Reactions and Dissolution Ratementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The thickness less than 10 nm for the stripping test was considered to be acceptable to avoid mixing with the resist. [18][19][20][21]…”
Section: Stripping Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fablication of solar cell devices using gas barrier materials, both spin coating and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) antireflective coating have respective advantages and disadvantages. Spin coating process using a conventional thermal cross-link planar material was reported to decrease the thicknesses bias between the blanket areas and interconnect areas in lithography techniques [3][4][5][6][7][8]. In addition, CVD was used as another coating method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%