2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25958-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Face Detection and Facial Image Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subset of labeled faces in the wild (LFW) dataset (Learned-Miller et al, 2016), which was involved into the face identification protocol (Best-Rowden et al, 2014). C = 596 subjects who have at least two images in the LFW database and at least one video in the YouTube Faces (YTF) database (subjects in YTF are a subset of those in LFW) are used in all clustering methods.…”
Section: Facial Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subset of labeled faces in the wild (LFW) dataset (Learned-Miller et al, 2016), which was involved into the face identification protocol (Best-Rowden et al, 2014). C = 596 subjects who have at least two images in the LFW database and at least one video in the YouTube Faces (YTF) database (subjects in YTF are a subset of those in LFW) are used in all clustering methods.…”
Section: Facial Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the main purpose of this paper is face grouping in unsupervised environment, it is important to analyze the quality of face identification of the proposed model. Thus, in the last experiment of this subsection I deal with the LFW dataset (Learned-Miller et al, 2016) and PubFig83 dataset (Pinto et al, 2011). I took 9,164 photos of 1,680 persons from LFW with more than one photo.…”
Section: Facial Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network architecture for the face recognition is based on the ResNet-34 network [16], with a few layers removed and the number of filters per layer reduced by half. In this application, it is used a previous trained network, which has an accuracy of 99.4% on the standard Labeled Faces in the Wild benchmark [23]. To create our dataset of features, each face is mapped by the previous trained neural network to the corresponding feature The data set used to train the network was constituted by some persons that are part of the Research Center in Digitalization and Intelligent Robotics (CeDRI).…”
Section: Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We train the network using a metric loss function over 3 million faces from the FaceScrub [15] and VGG-Face [17] datasets. This model is able to predict with 99.38% accuracy if two faces belong to the same individual on the Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) [11] dataset.…”
Section: Salient Facementioning
confidence: 99%