2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23608-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Numerical Modelling of Adhesive Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
90
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
1
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though these analyses were promising, they had few limitations: stress/ strain predictions depend on the mesh size at the critical regions, while fracture criteria such as the Virtual Crack Closure Technique (VCCT) are restricted to Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) and need an initial crack. CZM have been used in the last decade for the strength prediction of adhesive joints, as an add-in to FE analyses that allows simulation of damage growth within bulk regions of continuous materials or interfaces between different materials [7,8]. Compared to conventional FE, a much more accurate prediction is achieved, since different shapes can be developed for the cohesive laws, depending on the nature of the material or interface to be simulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though these analyses were promising, they had few limitations: stress/ strain predictions depend on the mesh size at the critical regions, while fracture criteria such as the Virtual Crack Closure Technique (VCCT) are restricted to Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) and need an initial crack. CZM have been used in the last decade for the strength prediction of adhesive joints, as an add-in to FE analyses that allows simulation of damage growth within bulk regions of continuous materials or interfaces between different materials [7,8]. Compared to conventional FE, a much more accurate prediction is achieved, since different shapes can be developed for the cohesive laws, depending on the nature of the material or interface to be simulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material/interfacial behaviour that the CZM law is simulating should always be the leading decision factor to select the most appropriate shape. Despite this fact, other issues should be taken into account [7]. In fact, the CZM law shape also influences the iterative solving procedure and the time required to attain the solution of a given engineering problem: larger convergence difficulties in the iterative solving procedure usually take place for trapezoidal rather than triangular CZM laws, due to the more abrupt change of stiffness in the cohesive elements during stress softening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical techniques, specifically those based on the finite element method, have provided a means for analysing and predicting the failure of adhesive joints under various loading conditions. The finite element based methods may be classified as strength of materials, fracture mechanics and damage mechanics based methods [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesives are progressively being applied in structures of several branches of engineering, which also makes certification-related issues more important, especially in industries such as aeronautics [1]. Because of this, it is highly important the availability of robust predictive techniques that can reliably be used as design tools, to allow minimization of experi-mentation during the design stages of products and structures without compromising the design process [2,3]. This will allow assessing the feasibility of joining during the fabrication process of components (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%