1996
DOI: 10.1109/83.480761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in residual vector quantization: a review

Abstract: Advances in residual vector quantization (RVQ) are surveyed. Definitions of joint encoder optimality and joint decoder optimality are discussed. Design techniques for RVQs with large numbers of stages and generally different encoder and decoder codebooks are elaborated and extended. Fixed-rate RVQs, and variable-rate RVQs that employ entropy coding are examined. Predictive and finite state RVQs designed and integrated into neural-network based source coding structures are revisited. Successive approximation RV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Codes that can be used for multiresolution source description (whether or not that was the initial intention of their design) include treestructured scalar and vector quantizers [23]- [25], multistage or residual vector quantizers [26], [27], multiresolution transform codes (see, for example, [28], and the references therein), multiresolution trellis source codes [29], and multiresolution source codes combining wavelets or other frequency decompositions with zero-trees or other embedded codes [30]- [32]. We here focus on only the most closely related vector quantizers.…”
Section: Optimality Criteria For Code Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Codes that can be used for multiresolution source description (whether or not that was the initial intention of their design) include treestructured scalar and vector quantizers [23]- [25], multistage or residual vector quantizers [26], [27], multiresolution transform codes (see, for example, [28], and the references therein), multiresolution trellis source codes [29], and multiresolution source codes combining wavelets or other frequency decompositions with zero-trees or other embedded codes [30]- [32]. We here focus on only the most closely related vector quantizers.…”
Section: Optimality Criteria For Code Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods proposed that satisfy this demand are the sequential searchdirect sum codebook multistage VQ (residual VQ) [2] and the lattice VQ [3]. The problem of the former method is that quantization losses are caused by mismatches in the distributions between the stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the direct sum codebook size (sum of each stage codebook size) becomes large, the memory associated with the codetable becomes excessive. Several techniques have been presented to control the memory cost, for example, the entropyconstrained RVQ (EC-RVQ), predictive RVQ (PRVQ), and finite-state RVQ (FSRVQ) [4][5][6][7][8]. However, the design and implementation of the techniques are very complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third stage quantizes the second stage error output to provide a further refinement and so on. The error vector is also called residue; thus the MSVQ is sometimes referred to as residual VQ (RVQ) [4][5][6][7][8]. The output of each stage quantizer is a quantization index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%