2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2377(07)33004-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in the science and technology of diesel particulate filter simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the other test the pre-DPF water injection began at 9 g (3.3 g/l) and the loading continued up to 30 g (11 g/l). The maximum loading for this second test agrees with the value commonly accepted as high soot loading to promote active regeneration [25] because of excessive pressure drop and hence fuel penalty [19,26]. In fact, although the optimum soot loading to perform active regeneration reducing fuel penalty depends on the specific strategy [20], studies performed by Singh et al [27] found the optimum soot loading in 5.5 g/l to limit the fuel penalty due to excessive pressure drop.…”
Section: Types Of Testssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the other test the pre-DPF water injection began at 9 g (3.3 g/l) and the loading continued up to 30 g (11 g/l). The maximum loading for this second test agrees with the value commonly accepted as high soot loading to promote active regeneration [25] because of excessive pressure drop and hence fuel penalty [19,26]. In fact, although the optimum soot loading to perform active regeneration reducing fuel penalty depends on the specific strategy [20], studies performed by Singh et al [27] found the optimum soot loading in 5.5 g/l to limit the fuel penalty due to excessive pressure drop.…”
Section: Types Of Testssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Accordingly, they corrected the network analog assigning equal lengths to the two heat transfer paths R1 and R2 (''series equalized model'', Table 1). The reader should be aware that the expression for the calculation of k e,r given in [12] is incorrect and does not follow from the hypothesis given in the same work. In Table 1, however, the correct expression derived from such a model is given.…”
Section: Effective Radial Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) and (2) show that both the shape of the channel and the washcoat distribution do not affect k e,a : this is related to the fact that the path followed by heat along the axial direction is straight, independently of the channel and washcoat geometries. Accordingly, such equations can be used Konstandopoulos et al [12] Hayes et al [9] This paper Resistance layout Equivalent thermal resistance scheme for any bare or washcoated honeycomb monolith, provided that the cross-sectional area of each phase is constant over the axial distance.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations