2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in the systemic treatment of therapeutic approaches in biliary tract cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, they found that the ORR of dual immunotherapy combination was even 2% lower than that of single-agent immunotherapy combination; therefore, they concluded that chemotherapy combined with dual immunotherapy did not show significant advantages over single-agent immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced BTC, and even increased the financial cost for patients compared to single-agent immunotherapy. The study also found that the ORR of patients treated with second-line therapy in combination with immunotherapy was 20% lower than that of patients treated with first-line therapy, suggesting that patients benefit more from the combination of ICIs at first-line therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced BTC, This result is consistent with both our retrospective study and the results of the phase III clinical trial of TOPAZ-1 [ 7 , 19 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As a result, they found that the ORR of dual immunotherapy combination was even 2% lower than that of single-agent immunotherapy combination; therefore, they concluded that chemotherapy combined with dual immunotherapy did not show significant advantages over single-agent immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced BTC, and even increased the financial cost for patients compared to single-agent immunotherapy. The study also found that the ORR of patients treated with second-line therapy in combination with immunotherapy was 20% lower than that of patients treated with first-line therapy, suggesting that patients benefit more from the combination of ICIs at first-line therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced BTC, This result is consistent with both our retrospective study and the results of the phase III clinical trial of TOPAZ-1 [ 7 , 19 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Tyrosine kinase receptors known as FGFRs are implicated in regulating RAS, Janus kinase 2, and phosphoi-nositide 3-kinases (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin pathways, and FGFR2 abnormalities affect cellular migration, angiogenesis, proliferation, and survival processes[ 38 , 39 ]. Numerous medications that target FGFR isoforms, including infigratinib, pemigatinib, derazantinib, erdafitinib (ATP-competitive, reversible inhibitors), and futibatinib (non-ATP-competitive, covalent inhibitor), have been studied in iCCA patients during the past ten years[ 40 , 41 ]. In a phase 1 clinical trial with 3 CCA patients carrying FGFR2 abnormalities, the pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor infigratinib was originally evaluated, and all patients had stable condition[ 42 ].…”
Section: Targeted Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 Over the last 10 years, the prognosis of patients has changed significantly, mainly due to the availability of systemic treatment, both adjuvant and, in particular, systemic treatment of metastatic disease with targeted drugs. 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%