Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-32345-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Tibial Nailing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the materials field, a strong novelty was also introduced in the 1990s with the adoption of titanium, a new material competing with the until then commonly used AISI 136 LVM ASTM F138 stainless steel (generally known as medical‐grade stainless steel) . Today, both materials are widely accepted; however, there is a preferential tendency for titanium alloy owing to its attractive mechanical properties (see Table ), such as Young's modulus closer to the intact diaphyseal cortical bone, higher fatigue strength and yield strength, and the fact that it is biocompatible and shows less magnetic resonance imaging interference than that observed for stainless steel implants . Today, the increased preference for limited reaming or “ream‐to‐fit” techniques allowed the adoption of anatomically smaller diameter nails, which in static locked mode provide a sufficiently large interfragmentary motion that favors callus development .…”
Section: The Evolutionary Biomechanical Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the materials field, a strong novelty was also introduced in the 1990s with the adoption of titanium, a new material competing with the until then commonly used AISI 136 LVM ASTM F138 stainless steel (generally known as medical‐grade stainless steel) . Today, both materials are widely accepted; however, there is a preferential tendency for titanium alloy owing to its attractive mechanical properties (see Table ), such as Young's modulus closer to the intact diaphyseal cortical bone, higher fatigue strength and yield strength, and the fact that it is biocompatible and shows less magnetic resonance imaging interference than that observed for stainless steel implants . Today, the increased preference for limited reaming or “ream‐to‐fit” techniques allowed the adoption of anatomically smaller diameter nails, which in static locked mode provide a sufficiently large interfragmentary motion that favors callus development .…”
Section: The Evolutionary Biomechanical Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,14,[29][30][31][32] Today, the increased pref-erence for limited reaming or "ream-to-fit" techniques allowed the adoption of anatomically smaller diameter nails, which in static locked mode provide a sufficiently large interfragmentary motion that favors callus development. 10,21,32 Despite its effectiveness and reliability as a stabilization system, intramedullary nailing is still subject to constant upgrades that aim to improve the time and quality of the callus formation, as described below.…”
Section: The Evolutionary Biomechanical Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Closed intramedullary nailing has become the ''gold standard'' in the treatment of displaced fractures of the tibial shaft. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Due to their nature, intramedullary nails require high mechanical performance compared to their dimensions. Such occurrence has in turn driven a steadily growing request for high performance materials in terms of mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Kanal içi çivileme hem kilitli hem de kilitsiz olarak uygulanabilen, yüksek stabilite sağlaması ve erken yük vermeye izin vermesi gibi avantajlara sahip bir yöntemdir. [2][3][4] Kilitli kanal içi çivileme, stabil ve minimal invaziv bir yöntem olmakla birlikte gelişen teknolojiye rağmen yüksek ameliyat sırası ve sonrası komplikasyon riski, uzun cerrahi süre-si ve aşırı radyasyona maruz kalma gibi dezavantajlara sahiptir. [2,5] Diğer yandan, kilitsiz kanal içi çivileme, uygulama kolaylığı, kısa cerrahi süresi, daha düşük radyasyona maruz kalma gibi avantajlara sahipken özellikle rotasyonel instabilite, çivinin proksimale yer değiştirmesi, kötü kaynama (malunion) ve bazen alçı gibi ek tespit gerektirmesi bu yöntemin dezavantajları-nı oluşturmaktadır.…”
unclassified