2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing Enhanced Oil Recovery as a Sequestration Asset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CO 2 stream produced from the decarbonation cell may also have value in applications that up-cycle captured CO 2 . CO 2 is already used to enhance oil recovery (EOR) (63,64) and to make chemicals such as urea, salicylic acid, methanol, carbonates (65), synthetic fuel (via the Fischer-Tropsch process) (66), and synthetic natural gas (via the Sabatier reaction) (67). There is growing interest in finding ways to react CO 2 electrochemically or photochemically to create chemicals and fuels from captured CO 2 using renewable electricity (68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO 2 stream produced from the decarbonation cell may also have value in applications that up-cycle captured CO 2 . CO 2 is already used to enhance oil recovery (EOR) (63,64) and to make chemicals such as urea, salicylic acid, methanol, carbonates (65), synthetic fuel (via the Fischer-Tropsch process) (66), and synthetic natural gas (via the Sabatier reaction) (67). There is growing interest in finding ways to react CO 2 electrochemically or photochemically to create chemicals and fuels from captured CO 2 using renewable electricity (68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today CO 2 -EOR has the potential to sequester 30 GtCO 2 if the CO 2 used in oil recovery [assuming an industry standard of 3 bbl oil per tCO 2 sequestered] is left in the ground after oil production (Kuuskraa, 2013;International Energy Agency, 2015). Advanced CO 2 -EOR methods, designed to co-optimize both oil recovery and CO 2 sequestration, could sequester over 90 GtCO 2 (National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine, 2019), and this could increase oil production compared to standard CO 2 -EOR methods (Benson and Deutch, 2018).…”
Section: Geological Sequestration In Saline Aquifers and Oil And Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model results, along with CO 2 reduction costeffectiveness, do not represent full benefit-cost analyses of individual projects. Ideally, a full benefit-cost analysis for an individual project would include: site specific generation profiles and detailed electrical dispatch model runs for RE; full health benefits and impacts of emissions changes from coal with CCS [39,46,47]; full life cycle impacts for fossil fuel use changes, including increases in the case of coal with CCS [39,[48][49][50]; impacts of captured CO 2 , especially if it is used for enhanced oil recovery [45,51]; electricity price effects [52,53], and impacts from RE manufacture and installation [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Including Carbon Emissions Reductions and Health Benefits Inmentioning
confidence: 99%