2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing environmental flows approaches to streamflow depletion management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our results capture the effects of snowmelt effects to some extent, but the dynamics by which the snow melts (e.g., in a single, high‐intensity event vs. spread out across multiple, smaller events) can certainly mediate streamflow responses to snowmelt and should be addressed in future studies that make use of hydrologic streamflow models. Second, we did not explicitly account for management actions or perturbations that could affect surface water runoff (local geology, impervious surfaces, wetland restoration, and reservoirs) or groundwater inflow (withdrawal from wells, or best management practices for groundwater recharge) into streams, which can mediate effects on stream flow and water temperature (Lapides et al, 2022) and in turn aquatic biota (Stelzer et al, 2022). Ultimately, intrinsic drivers of population dynamics (intraspecific density dependence feedbacks) should be integrated with extrinsic drivers (interspecific interactions, streamflow, temperature, and management) over the entire life cycle of freshwater animals to explain variation in demography and thus predict population responses to environmental change (Bassar et al, 2016; Kovach et al, 2016; Letcher et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, our results capture the effects of snowmelt effects to some extent, but the dynamics by which the snow melts (e.g., in a single, high‐intensity event vs. spread out across multiple, smaller events) can certainly mediate streamflow responses to snowmelt and should be addressed in future studies that make use of hydrologic streamflow models. Second, we did not explicitly account for management actions or perturbations that could affect surface water runoff (local geology, impervious surfaces, wetland restoration, and reservoirs) or groundwater inflow (withdrawal from wells, or best management practices for groundwater recharge) into streams, which can mediate effects on stream flow and water temperature (Lapides et al, 2022) and in turn aquatic biota (Stelzer et al, 2022). Ultimately, intrinsic drivers of population dynamics (intraspecific density dependence feedbacks) should be integrated with extrinsic drivers (interspecific interactions, streamflow, temperature, and management) over the entire life cycle of freshwater animals to explain variation in demography and thus predict population responses to environmental change (Bassar et al, 2016; Kovach et al, 2016; Letcher et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined for seasons preceding annual trout surveys that represent important time periods for trout life history: summer (June–August), autumn (September–November), winter (December–February), and spring (March–May). These periods generally reflect the adult pre‐spawning, adult spawning, egg incubation, and fry‐hatching and ‐rearing periods for stream trout in the northern hemisphere (Behnke, 2010; Kovach et al, 2016; Lapides et al, 2022), respectively. Environmental data were offset to recruitment years using appropriate time lags; for example, trout survey data from summer 2010 were matched to environmental data from summer and autumn of 2009, winter of 2009–2010, and spring of 2010 to reflect conditions leading up to a recruitment survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native brook trout/maazhamegoons and introduced brown trout/ namegos are coldwater species that support stream fisheries across Wisconsin. Both species rely on coldwater temperatures (Lyons et al, 2010;Wehrly et al, 2007), sustained groundwater inputs (Lyons et al, 2009) (Lapides et al, 2022), and improvements in land use to improve groundwater recharge have been instrumental in recovering coldwater streams in the Driftless Area, which is now projected to be a region of high resistance and resilience to climate warming (Mitro et al, 2019). Stream channel restoration has been used to narrow and deepen channels to help conserve coldwater as it flows downstream, and riparian shading has helped further maintain coldwater temperatures in streams (Cross et al, 2013;Gaffield et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resisting Stream Trout/maazhamegoons Loss Through Stocking L...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watershed‐scale management has been pursued across the state and includes promoting best management practices in agricultural land use such as no‐till or contour plowing for row crops, rotational grazing of grasslands, enrollment of environmentally sensitive lands in the Conservation Reserve Program, public acquisition of private lands for protection, and limiting impervious surfaces to reduce erosion and facilitate groundwater infiltration. Cold groundwater inputs to streams are critical to maintaining cold thermal conditions suitable for trout (Lapides et al, 2022), and improvements in land use to improve groundwater recharge have been instrumental in recovering coldwater streams in the Driftless Area, which is now projected to be a region of high resistance and resilience to climate warming (Mitro et al, 2019). Stream channel restoration has been used to narrow and deepen channels to help conserve coldwater as it flows downstream, and riparian shading has helped further maintain coldwater temperatures in streams (Cross et al, 2013; Gaffield et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resisting Ecosystem Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought indicators best capture the hydrological impacts of streamflow depletionLow flow metrics, such as 7-day low flow, are commonly used in management contexts(Lapides, Maitland, et al, 2022). Whilst 7-day minimum flow was impacted at many sites in the dry climate scenario, low flow duration and deficit were more consistently impacted; the maximum fraction of sites with 7-day minimum flow impacts is smaller than the 25th percentile for duration and deficit signatures under all F I G U R E 8 Random forest prediction of where GAGES-II streams were predicted to see changes in each signature group within 50 years based on the dry climate and periodic pumping scenario.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%