Accurate river streamflow forecasting is pivotal for effective water resource planning, infrastructure design, utilization, optimization, and flood planning and warning. Streamflow prediction remains a difficult task due to several factors such as climate change, topography, and lack of observed data in some cases. This paper investigates and evaluates the individual performances of the seasonal auto-regressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) and Prophet models in forecasting the streamflow of the Sobat River and proposes a hybrid SARIMA-Prophet model to leverage the strengths of both approaches. Using the augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (KPSS) tests, the flow of the Sobat River was found to be stationary. The performance of the models was then assessed based on their residual errors and predictive accuracy using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R2). Residual analysis and prediction capabilities revealed that Prophet slightly edged SARIMA in terms of prediction efficacy; however, both models struggled to effectively capture extreme values, resulting in significant overestimations and slight underestimations. The hybrid SARIMA-Prophet model significantly reduced residual variability, achieving a lower MAE of 4.047 m3/s, RMSE of 6.17 m3/s, and a higher R2 of 0.92 than did the SARIMA (MAE: 5.39 m3/s, RMSE: 8.70 m3/s, R2: 0.85) and Prophet (MAE: 5.35 m3/s, RMSE: 8.32 m3/s, and R2: 0.86) models. This indicates that the hybrid model handles both long-term patterns and short-term fluctuations more effectively than the individual models. The findings of the present study highlight the potential of hybrid SARIMA-Prophet models for streamflow forecasting in terms of accuracy and reliability, thus contributing to more effective water resource management and planning, particularly in the Sobat River.