2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing Training to Identify, Intervene, and Follow Up with Individuals at Risk for Suicide Through Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
45
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such concealment highlights the need for early detection of suicidality, so that those in need can be directed towards professional help (Seward & Harris, 2016;Wahlin & Deane, 2012;Wilson, Rickwood, & Deane, 2007). Experts have recognised the dilemma of at-risk individuals not seeking help on their own and advocate for more empirical evidence for early detection of suicidality, such as warning signs and risk factors that can be used by clinicians and gatekeepers to identify those at current or potential risk (Hempstead & Phillips, 2014;Osteen, Frey, & Ko, 2014). Warning signs are, however, not always clear or easily recognized and require greater study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such concealment highlights the need for early detection of suicidality, so that those in need can be directed towards professional help (Seward & Harris, 2016;Wahlin & Deane, 2012;Wilson, Rickwood, & Deane, 2007). Experts have recognised the dilemma of at-risk individuals not seeking help on their own and advocate for more empirical evidence for early detection of suicidality, such as warning signs and risk factors that can be used by clinicians and gatekeepers to identify those at current or potential risk (Hempstead & Phillips, 2014;Osteen, Frey, & Ko, 2014). Warning signs are, however, not always clear or easily recognized and require greater study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review of the Suicide Prevention Resource Center (SPRC) evidence‐based programs and programs listed as “adhering to standards” in terms of content shows that training varies widely with regard to content, intended audience, target outcomes, assessment tools, time requirements, and modality of delivery. Developing, implementing, and assessing suicide prevention behavior are difficult and complex tasks, in part because of the heterogeneous groups needing training; diverse populations of at risk; diverse settings in which suicide intervention services occur; different tasks that providers perform such as identifying risk, assessing and managing risk, and treatment; lack of standardized measures of training effectiveness; and limited data linking training outcomes to reductions in suicide deaths (Osteen, Frey, & Ko, ; Pisani, Cross, & Gould, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto podría sugerir que, aunque las percepciones y actitudes son importantes, estas no siempre van a la par con las acciones. Las actitudes representan una de las principales áreas de intervención en los adiestramientos para la prevención del suicidio, además del conocimiento y las destrezas, acciones o conductas (Osteen, Frey, & Jungyai, 2014). No obstante, una revisión de literatura ha sugerido que mejorar actitudes no siempre está asociado a cambios en las acciones o conductas (Chaiklin, 2011 implica que no existen procedimientos de manejo claros para los profesionales, lo que podría generar mayor vulnerabilidad en el manejo de las situaciones donde haya una persona con riesgo suicida.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Aunque se espera que estos mejoren las actitudes de las personas para explorar ideación suicida, este adiestramiento, al igual que los que aparecen en el Registro de Prácticas Basadas en la Evidencia (Osteen et al, 2014), estuvo más enfocado en el aumento de conocimiento y destrezas que en actitudes. Más importante resulta el hecho de que no se hizo seguimiento para evaluar si los aumentos se mantuvieron a largo plazo y si hubo cambios en las prácticas, según es recomendado (Osteen et al, 2014). Asimismo, la falta de un grupo control y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra limitan la interpretación de los resultados.…”
Section: Limitaciones Y Recomendacionesunclassified