2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1471-5953(02)00114-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing working and learning through critical action research: creativity and constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These outcomes can be personal and/or interpersonal. Personal outcomes include improved job satisfaction (Allameh, Abbasi, & Shokrani, 2010;Seok, Lee, In, Lee, & Kim, 2007) and increased awareness of the reason behind one's actions (Bellman, Bywood, & Dale, 2003). Interpersonal team outcomes include more effective teamwork (Davis, 2011;Henderson, Burmeister, Schoonbeek, Ossenberg, & Gneilding, 2014), decreased nurse turnover rates (Ford & Angermeier, 2008) and better communication (Edmondson, 2003a(Edmondson, , 2003b.…”
Section: Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These outcomes can be personal and/or interpersonal. Personal outcomes include improved job satisfaction (Allameh, Abbasi, & Shokrani, 2010;Seok, Lee, In, Lee, & Kim, 2007) and increased awareness of the reason behind one's actions (Bellman, Bywood, & Dale, 2003). Interpersonal team outcomes include more effective teamwork (Davis, 2011;Henderson, Burmeister, Schoonbeek, Ossenberg, & Gneilding, 2014), decreased nurse turnover rates (Ford & Angermeier, 2008) and better communication (Edmondson, 2003a(Edmondson, , 2003b.…”
Section: Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is not obtained, the odds increase significantly for perceiving barriers to research utilization (Kajermo et al 2008). Bellman et al (2003) argue that some nurse leaders are promoted because of their allegiance to maintaining the status quo and by doing so are disempowering nursing. Kjerholt et al (2015) demonstrates how a nurse leader who experiences potential challenges to her authority may use power to cancel or postpone planned research activities and by doing so suppress the role of the researcher and inhibit the project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dette skulle gjennomføres ved utprøving av den digitale laeringsplattformens muligheter sammen med studentene. I det metodiske valget for prosjektet ble anvendelse av prinsippene innen aksjonsforskning valgt som fremgangsmå te, fordi de syntes å tilby oss relevante metodiske redskaper i forhold til gjennomføring og datainnsamling (Bellman, Bywood & Dale, 2003;Smith et al, 2000). I litteraturen er det beskrevet kriterier som skiller aksjonsforskning fra andre typer forskning.…”
Section: Metode Og Forskningstilnaermingunclassified