Extending donor heart preservation time would offer several advantages. Surgical results would likely improve because it has been demonstrated with present solutions that cold ischemic times inversely correlate with postoperative survival. 1 It also would allow for O ne of the most significant limitations in heart transplantation is the relatively short preservation time that current preservation solutions offer. Safe organ preservation can be maintained for only 4 hours.Objectives: A donor heart preservation solution was designed to use hyperpolarized arrest with the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium-channel opener pinacidil. This solution contained concentrations of potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, lactobionate, and the buffer histidine specifically chosen to minimize intracellular calcium accumulation associated with prolonged ischemia.Methods: Twenty-four rabbit hearts were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 preservation solutions in a crystalloid-perfused Langendorff model: (1) prototype solution containing a 0.5 mmol/L concentration of pinacidil, (2) prototype solution without pinacidil as control, and (3) University of Wisconsin solution. Thirty minutes of initial perfusion preceded baseline data acquisition. Data comprised left ventricle pressure-volume curves generated by inflating an intraventricular latex balloon. After cardioplegic administration, hearts underwent 4 hours of hypothermic storage, followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion and postischemic data acquisition.Results: Postischemic developed pressure was better preserved by pinacidil solution (92.4% ± 4.5%) than by the control (74.9% ± 3.4%, P = .01) and University of Wisconsin solutions (66.7% ± 5.1%, P = .001). Diastolic negative dP/dT was better preserved by pinacidil solution (104.4% ± 10.2%) than by the control (80.2% ± 4.2%, P = .034) and University of Wisconsin solutions (71.7% ± 7.0%, P = .015). Diastolic compliance, expressed as baseline/postischemic diastolic slope ratios, was more poorly preserved by University of Wisconsin solution (0.67 ± 0.07) than by the pinacidil (0.88 ± 0.05, P = .041) and control solutions (0.87 ± 0.05, P = .021). Postischemic coronary flow was higher in hearts exposed to pinacidil solution (77.8% ± 3.0%) than in those exposed to the control (66.8% ± 2.4%) and University of Wisconsin solutions (70.9% ± 4.0%, P = .07).
Conclusions:The superiority of the pinacidil solution in this experiment demonstrated that hyperpolarized arrest with potassium-channel openers improves donor heart preservation when administered in a novel histidinebuffered lactobionate-enriched vehicle.