Adverbial Markers of Epistemic Modality Across Disciplinary Discourses: A Contrastive Study of Research Articles in Six Academic Disciplines

Abstract

Epistemic adverbs, like other markers of epistemic modality, are concerned with the speaker's assessment of the truth value of the proposition. In other words, they indicate that the speaker considers certain situations as possible, impossible, probable, certain, or uncertain. At the same time, they signal the author's presence in the text, and invite the reader to make his/her own conclusions and interpretations. The use of modal markers has been demonstrated to differ across academic disciplines, but the specific differences concerning the use of epistemic adverbs have not been studied systematically. This paper investigates the use of epistemic adverbs in research articles representing six disciplines belonging to three different branches of science: the humanities (linguistics and literary studies), the social sciences (law and sociology), and the natural sciences (physics and medicine), with the aim of establishing discipline-specific tendencies in their use. The study is based on a corpus of 160 research articles compiled by the author. It begins with an attempt at delimiting the category of epistemic adverbs in English. After that, a list of the most frequent epistemic adverbs in the subcorpora of all the disciplines is established and discussed. The study demonstrates that frequent use of epistemic adverbs is largely a property of research articles in the humanities and social sciences. Medical and physics research articles use them significantly less often. The most frequent epistemic adverbs in the research articles under analysis include indeed,

Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study

“…Humanities, though slightly more than social sciences, are seen as the most prone discipline to the use of modality with the highest frequency rate in the use of modal markers. The Initial count of EpM and DeM modal verbs in three disciplines indicates a very low tendency of deontic modal verbs with 6.44 % in the total of 9936 analyzed instances of modal verbs and very high propensity of EpM with 93.5 % in all three disciplines, as similar to the tendency revealed in Rozumko (2017) and Piqué-Angordans, Posteguillo & Andreu-Besó (2002).…”

Corporate censorship online: Vagueness and discursive imprecision in YouTube’s advertiser-friendly content guidelines

“…Epistemic stance adverbials that introduce uncertainty into a proposition (e.g. ‘possibly’) (Rozumko, 2017: 76);…”

“…Besides illustrating the use of modal verbs, (4) showcases another phenomenon occurring in overall three lines, 14 namely the use of epistemic stance adverbials (Rozumko, 2017: 76). In this excerpt, after using the modal verb ‘may’ to decrease certainty of the proposition ‘content that features X is unsuitable for advertising/monetisation through ads’, YouTube refers to a possible exception to the rule in the second sentence.…”

Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest

“…As Simon-Vandenbergen and Aijmer (2007, p. 1) state, "modality has always been a fascinating area to philosophers, logicians as well as linguists, and has been approached from a large number of different perspectives." English shows a wide variety of resources to communicate modality: modal nouns (Akiba, 2016;Ilkhanipour, 2016), adjectives (Van linden, 2012), adverbs (Rozumko, 2017;Velasquez, 2014), modal auxiliaries (Biber et al, 1999;Coates, 1983;Huddleston & Pullum, 2002;Palmer, 1990;Quirk et al, 1985) and lexical verbs (Dontcheva-Navratilova, 2018; Salazar & Verdaguer, 2009;). Zhang (2019, p. 879) explains that:…”