2011
DOI: 10.2994/057.006.0307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advertisement Call ofSphaenorhynchus mirimCaramaschi, Almeida and Gasparini, 2009, (Anura: Hylidae)

Abstract: Anuran vocalization is species-specific and bioacoustic analyses are important tools for species delimitation. The present study describes the vocalization of Sphaenorhynchus mirim, recognizing two different types of call, here referred to as call type A and call type B. We analyzed a total of 86 calls of type A and 15 calls of type B. Call type A consists of a single multipulsed note with duration of 34.12-101.00 ms, with 9-25 pulses/note, pulse rate ranges from 240.40-338.21 pulses/sec and the dominant frequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advertisement call of Sphaenorhynchus canga sp. nov. further differentiates it from that of S. caramaschii (call duration of 5.23-11.0 s, 22-43 notes/call, and note duration of 0.037-0.07 s; Toledo et al 2007;Toledo et al 2014) by its shorter duration, lower number of notes/call, and shorter note duration (call duration of 0.008-1.23 s, 1-9 notes/call, and note duration of 0.005-0.020 s); S. mirim (9-25 pulses/note; Lacerda et al 2011) by its lower number of pulses/note (1-5 pulses/note); S. pauloalvini and S. prasinus (interval between notes of 0.01-0.02 s in S. pauloalvini, and 0.014-0.018 s in S. prasinus; Toledo et al 2014) by its larger interval between notes (0.05-0.23 s); and S. planicola (note duration of 0.08-0.17 s, and interval between notes of 0.24 s; Toledo et al 2014) by its shorter note duration and shorter interval between notes (note duration of 0.005-0.020 s, and interval between notes of 0.05-0.23 s).…”
Section: Sphaenorhynchusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advertisement call of Sphaenorhynchus canga sp. nov. further differentiates it from that of S. caramaschii (call duration of 5.23-11.0 s, 22-43 notes/call, and note duration of 0.037-0.07 s; Toledo et al 2007;Toledo et al 2014) by its shorter duration, lower number of notes/call, and shorter note duration (call duration of 0.008-1.23 s, 1-9 notes/call, and note duration of 0.005-0.020 s); S. mirim (9-25 pulses/note; Lacerda et al 2011) by its lower number of pulses/note (1-5 pulses/note); S. pauloalvini and S. prasinus (interval between notes of 0.01-0.02 s in S. pauloalvini, and 0.014-0.018 s in S. prasinus; Toledo et al 2014) by its larger interval between notes (0.05-0.23 s); and S. planicola (note duration of 0.08-0.17 s, and interval between notes of 0.24 s; Toledo et al 2014) by its shorter note duration and shorter interval between notes (note duration of 0.005-0.020 s, and interval between notes of 0.05-0.23 s).…”
Section: Sphaenorhynchusmentioning
confidence: 99%