2008
DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200831090-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advice on Drug Safety in Pregnancy

Abstract: The results of this study show considerable differences between two Norwegian sources providing advice on the use of drugs in pregnancy. Based on the knowledge that healthcare providers choose sources of information in a random manner, our results may be of clinical importance. We believe that the problem with heterogeneous drug information on this subject is not confined to Norway and that our results should be of international interest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence of a lack of consistency between information on drug safety during pregnancy based on different information sources [23-25]. For example, according to the study by Frost Widnes and Schjøtt [24], the Norwegian Compendium on Product Monographs gives advice which is more restrictive than that given by drug information centers. Furthermore, patient information leaflets have been shown to include varying information concerning medicine use during pregnancy when different brand names of the same active substance are compared [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence of a lack of consistency between information on drug safety during pregnancy based on different information sources [23-25]. For example, according to the study by Frost Widnes and Schjøtt [24], the Norwegian Compendium on Product Monographs gives advice which is more restrictive than that given by drug information centers. Furthermore, patient information leaflets have been shown to include varying information concerning medicine use during pregnancy when different brand names of the same active substance are compared [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, lack of available relevant documentation can also increase the time spent handling a query, as extensive literature searches may have to be done to make sure no information is overlooked. Finally, queries regarding adverse events, which are the most common category of queries to RELIS, might require searches for case reports or case series in databases like Medline or Embase, and such searches might be time consuming, depending on the availability of suitable search terms [17]. This finding implies the importance of availability of high quality literature sources for DICs to be effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate discrepancies related to the medicine use during pregnancy and lactation, the investigators collected the data for all the COVID-19 medications. They were then divided into six following categories, namely 'can be used,' 'individual benefit-risk assessment,' 'should not be used, 'trimester-specific information' (related to pregnancy), 'not classifiable,' 'no available information as derived by Frost Widnes and Jan Schott [ 41 ]. The research team also provided descriptions of each category for the proper classifications of the recommendations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%