2019
DOI: 10.1057/s41254-019-00156-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advocates or adversaries? Explicating within-border foreign publics’ role in shaping soft power through megaphoning and echoing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of this study, we surveyed the GKS students, who are foreigners that had spent at least 10 months in Korea, after which they evaluated the country in a survey. Their evaluations of Korea were more informed due to their direct first-hand and behavioral experiences rather than having obtained mere impressions through symbolic communication (Choi et al 2019;Tam and Kim 2019;Vibber and Kim 2019). In other words, the GKS recipients experienced "close, direct, experiential, and sociological" communication with Koreans during their long stays in the country, compared to other foreigners' "essentially distant, mediated and superficial" communications with Korea and Koreans through the culture media and international news (Yun and Kim 2008, p. 568).…”
Section: Country Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study, we surveyed the GKS students, who are foreigners that had spent at least 10 months in Korea, after which they evaluated the country in a survey. Their evaluations of Korea were more informed due to their direct first-hand and behavioral experiences rather than having obtained mere impressions through symbolic communication (Choi et al 2019;Tam and Kim 2019;Vibber and Kim 2019). In other words, the GKS recipients experienced "close, direct, experiential, and sociological" communication with Koreans during their long stays in the country, compared to other foreigners' "essentially distant, mediated and superficial" communications with Korea and Koreans through the culture media and international news (Yun and Kim 2008, p. 568).…”
Section: Country Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tam and Kim’s ( 2019 ) recent taxonomy of important foreign publics for achieving public diplomacy goals highlights that a positive behavioral experience with a country is key to having the foreign public communicate positively on behalf of that country (i.e., advocational or ambassadorial foreign publics). An empirical study by Vibber and Kim ( 2019 ) provides further support for this connection, finding that within-border foreign publics (e.g., international exchange students) who perceived their relationship with the host country positively reported higher scores on positive megaphoning and lower scores on negative megaphoning. In addition, this positive or negative megaphoning to members of their home country was positively related to an echoing effect where members of their social networks in their home country repeated or reshared the original messages, positive or negative, and magnifying their reach (c.f.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The concept of megaphoning was developed in the employee context (Kim and Rhee 2011 ) and has been utilized successfully in research on fan publics (Krishna and Kim 2016 ), as well as in the conceptualization of within-border foreign publics’ communicative action in support of, or against, their host country (Vibber and Kim 2015 , 2019 ). Its application in this study on citizens’ communicative action around mega-events is the first that the authors are aware of on this topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations