2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerobic biodegradation characteristics and metabolic products of quinoline by a Pseudomonas strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, previous studies found that the quinoline degradation genes may locate in the plasmids of the strains (Aislabie et al 1990;Sun et al 2009). But this study demonstrated that the degradation genes were all located in the chromosome as no plasmid was observed in the strain BC001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, previous studies found that the quinoline degradation genes may locate in the plasmids of the strains (Aislabie et al 1990;Sun et al 2009). But this study demonstrated that the degradation genes were all located in the chromosome as no plasmid was observed in the strain BC001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Compared with another quinoline-degrading bacterium of Pseudomonas sp. in our laboratory which has only nitrification potential (Sun et al 2009), the strain BC001 accomplished heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification simultaneously. The BC001 could utilize quinoline-N thoroughly if proper extra C source was provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] Over the past decade, biodegradation of quinoline had been extensively investigated, and various quinolinedegrading bacteria had been obtained. [14][15][16][17][18] Recently, Sun et al 19) studied the biodegradation characteristics and metabolic products of quinoline by Pseudomonas sp. isolated from activated sludge in a coking wastewater treatment plant and found that the strain could degrade 192-911 mg/L quinoline within 3-8 h, with removal rates ranging from 96 to 98%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different bacteria and fungi, such as Rhodococcus sp., Burkholderia pickettii, Comamonas sp. and white rot fungus, have been used for degradation of quinoline (Cui et al 2004;Sun et al 2009;Zhang et al 2007). However, it has been found that these bacteria suffer from substrate inhibition, whereby growth (and consequently quinoline degradation) is inhibited at high quinoline concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%