1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00199-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic investigations for the tender design concepts of the Øresund cable-stayed bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). The deck properties for these three bridges are depicted in the Table 2 reported by Kiviluoma [6], Ge and Tanaka [2], Strommen et al [17] and Krishna [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). The deck properties for these three bridges are depicted in the Table 2 reported by Kiviluoma [6], Ge and Tanaka [2], Strommen et al [17] and Krishna [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drag coefficient of the bridge girder measured from the wind tunnel tests at Central South University is 0.6452 at the zero wind angle of attack with respect to the girder height of 15.3 m, and the lift and moment coefficients are 0.0308 and 0.1065, respectively with respect to the girder width of 36.8 m. The first derivatives of the drag, lift, and moment coefficients (C D , C L , C M ) with respect to zero wind angle of attack are 0.3266, 4.3144, and 0.6088, respectively. In the simulation of the self-excited forces, the flutter derivatives for horizontal direction are computed based on the quasi-steady theory and the results from a similar bridge girder (Øresund Strait Bridge) is utilized for other directions [44]. The first 10 natural modes are taken into consideration in the buffeting response analysis, and a frequency interval about 0.001 is used within the range from 0.001 to 2 Hz.…”
Section: Comparison Of Buffeting Analysis Between Field-measurements mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oresund bridge is a multiple-span cable-stayed bridge with a trussed double-deck carrying road as well as rail traffic. The data for this study have been adopted from Strommen et al (1999) and Ostenfeld and Larsen (1992). The data for these bridges are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%